| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
Algae > Volume 40(2); 2025 > Article
Eom, Ok, You, Park, Kwon, Kang, and Jeong: Temporal changes in the structure of protist communities incubated under normoxic and hypoxic conditions: a metabarcoding analysis

ABSTRACT

Hypoxia often causes the large-scale mortality of benthic organisms and alters the structure and function of pelagic and benthic communities. Protists are a major component of pelagic and benthic communities. Using a metabarcoding analysis, we explored the temporal changes in the structure of protist communities incubated for seven days under normoxic (7.0 mg L−1) and hypoxic (1.5 mg L−1) conditions. The incubated water was originally collected from Tongyeong Bay, Korea, where hypoxia frequently occurs. Among the phyla, the relative amplicon sequence variant (ASV) abundance of Cercozoa and Ochrophyta increased under hypoxia from day 0 to day 7, whereas that of other phyla declined or remained similar. Moreover, the relative ASV abundances in the phylum Dinoflagellata under both oxygen conditions were highest on days 0, 3, and 7. Among the dinoflagellate orders, the highest dinoflagellate ASV abundance under hypoxia on day 7 belonged to the order Peridiniales, whereas the highest relative read abundance belonged to Prorocentrales. The 35 dinoflagellate species that were detected under the hypoxic condition during incubation were autotrophic (two), phototrophic (autotrophic or mixotrophic) (15), mixotrophic (eight), kleptoplastidic (one), heterotrophic (eight), and parasitic (one), indicating that dinoflagellates with diverse trophic modes are present under hypoxia. Of these detected dinoflagellate species, 14 were present under the hypoxia on day 7. Furthermore, 19 dinoflagellate species were newly determined to be present under hypoxia, 6 of which were present on day 7. These findings highlight the ecological resilience and adaptability of protist communities under the hypoxic condition. The present study provides insights into the potential roles of protists in maintaining ecosystem functions in the oxygen-depleted environments.

INTRODUCTION

Coastal hypoxia, oxygen concentration of <2 mg L−1, has been observed in the coastal areas of most countries (Diaz and Rosenberg 2008, Gilbert et al. 2010, Whitney 2022, Eom et al. 2024). This phenomenon is becoming more frequent, widespread, persistent, and intense (Wu 2002, Rabalais et al. 2010, Breitburg et al. 2018, López-Abbate 2021 ). Eutrophication and global warming increase organic matter decomposition and stratification, which are two critical factors that cause hypoxia (Diaz 2001, Rabalais et al. 2010, Sheng et al. 2024). Hypoxia affects the ecophysiology of marine organisms by altering their survival, growth, reproduction, and development (Forbes and Lopez 1990, Richmond et al. 2006, Sampaio et al. 2021 ). Larger metazoans that actively swim can escape from the hypoxic environment (Bell and Eggleston 2005, Levin et al. 2009, Zhu et al. 2013), but smaller protists that swim weakly or do not swim are exposed to hypoxia for a prolonged period if it persists.
Marine protists are major components of marine ecosystems (Jeong et al. 2013, Yoo et al. 2013, Slaveykova et al. 2016, Kang et al. 2023b, Rappaport and Oliverio 2023). They have diverse trophic modes, exclusive autotrophy, mixotrophy, kleptoplastidy, and heterotrophy, and thus play diverse ecological roles as primary producers, prey, predators, symbionts, parasites, and hosts (Azam et al. 1983, Jeong et al. 2010, Caron et al. 2012, Kang et al. 2023a, Ok et al. 2023b, Cohen et al. 2024, Durmuş 2024, Park et al. 2024a, 2024b, You et al. 2024). Marine protists affect the structure and function of marine ecosystems, including biogeochemical cycles (Sherr et al. 2007, Anderson et al. 2013, Edgcomb 2016, Mitra et al. 2016, Lim and Jeong 2022). Therefore, understanding the effect of hypoxia on the structure and function of protist communities is critical to investigate the structure and function of marine ecosystems.
Traditionally, protists have been identified by light microscopy (Barsanti et al. 2021). However, this method has critical limitations, because it cannot distinguish sister species with subtle morphological differences (McManus and Katz 2009, Barsanti et al. 2021, Gaonkar and Campbell 2024). The recently developed environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding method is a powerful molecular approach for exploring the structures of protist communities (Burki et al. 2021, Jang et al. 2022). In particular, even cryptic, rare, and or previously overlooked taxa can be detected using the highly sensitive metabarcoding method (Cuvelier et al. 2010, Abad et al. 2016, Kim et al. 2023, Sahu et al. 2023). Prior to the present study, metabarcoding methods were applied to characterize the protist community structure in the hypoxic coastal waters of the Long Island Sound and Gulf of Mexico in the United States, Tolo Harbor in Hong Kong, and Jinhae and Masan Bay in Korea (Rocke et al. 2013, 2016, Santoferrara et al. 2022, Ok et al. 2023a). These studies collected hypoxic water samples either once per study site (Rocke et al. 2013, Santoferrara et al. 2022, Ok et al. 2023a) or twice—at the onset of hypoxia on August 17 and during hypoxia on August 24—throughout the hypoxic event that persisted from August 17 to 31 (Rocke et al. 2016). To determine which groups can tolerate hypoxia for a long time, it is necessary to monitor the structure of protist communities under the hypoxic condition that are maintained for a long time.
Tongyeong Bay, a semi-enclosed bay on the southern coast of Korea, experiences severe hypoxia between June and October (National Institute of Fisheries Science 2015–2023). This bay has shallow depths and slow currents and thus, has become one of the major aquaculture areas in Korea (Kim et al. 2020, Oktavitri et al. 2021, Tran et al. 2022). Extensive long-line aquaculture and coastal development have led to excessive nutrient input in the coasts, causing a long hypoxic period in the summer to other aquaculture grounds along the southern coast of Korea (National Institute of Fisheries Science 2013–2020). Therefore, Tongyeong Bay is an ideal region for investigating the changes in protistan communities under hypoxic conditions. A few metabarcoding studies have been conducted on protist communities in Tongyeong Bay; however, these studies did not investigate protist communities under hypoxic conditions (Kim et al. 2017, Jung et al. 2018, Hwang et al. 2022).
In the present study, surface seawater from Tongyeong Bay was collected and incubated under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions in a laboratory. The structure of the protist communities under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions was investigated on days 0, 3, and 7, using metabarcoding. Changes in protist community structure, the phyla and species surviving hypoxia, and the trophic modes of the surviving species were explored. Thus, the present study provides a basis for understanding the changes in the protist community structure in hypoxic environments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seawater sampling

A 60-L surface water was collected using a clean bucket from a sampling station (SNUTY) located in Buksin Bay off Tongyeong, Korea on May 30, 2024, and then gently screened with a 100-μm sieve (Fig. 1A). The dissolved oxygen (DO), water temperature, and salinity were measured using a YSI EXO 1 instrument (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Water was directly transported to the laboratory and placed overnight in a temperature-controlled chamber at the same water temperature as the water sampled at the site. The water sampled at the site exhibited a DO of 5.8 mg L−1, a pH of 8.4, a water temperature of 21.8°C, and a salinity of 31.6.

Incubation of the seawater in the laboratory

The experiment was designed to explore changes in the structure of protist communities during the incubation of seawater for seven days under the normoxic (7.0 mg L−1) and hypoxic (1.5 mg L−1) conditions using a metabarcoding method.
The water in the jar was equally distributed into six experimental wide-mouth 5-L Duran bottles (Duran GLS80; Schott, Mainz, Germany). Triplicate bottles for the normoxic condition were placed on shelves outside an oxygen-controlled glovebox in a temperature-controlled chamber, and the ones for the hypoxia condition inside the oxygen-controlled glovebox (Fig. 1B). All bottles were incubated at 22°C with a 14 : 10 light : dark cycle illuminated by 30 μmol photons m−2 s−1 of cool white fluorescent light. The DO sensor (Multilab FDO 4410 IDS sensor) inside each bottle was calibrated and assembled into a Multilab 4010-3W (YSI Inc.), and the real-time DO was recorded. A stirring magnet was placed inside the bottle to maintain the desired oxygen level throughout the incubation period. Simultaneously, the pH and water temperature in the bottles were recorded using Multilab IDS 4110 pH and temperature sensors connected to a Multilab 4010-3 W (YSI Inc.).
To create the hypoxic condition without altering the pH, 400 parts per million (ppm) of CO2 and the rest balanced with N2 were added to a compressed gas cylinder (Clark and Gobler 2016, Bausch et al. 2019, Eom et al. 2024). The mixture of CO2 and N2 released from the cylinder was sent to an oxygen-controlled glovebox (Fig. 1C). A Coy Oxygen Controller (Coy Laboratory Products, Grass Lake, MI, USA) placed between the cylinder and glovebox maintained the target hypoxic condition continuously in the glovebox during the entire experiment. To avoid possible shock to different O2 concentrations, protist communities were acclimated to the normoxic and hypoxic conditions for two days before the experiment.

Subsampling and analyses

After thorough stirring inside each bottle, an aliquot of 50 mL was taken from each bottle every day, except on day 6. The water incubated under the normoxic condition was sampled in a temperature-controlled chamber, whereas sampling under the hypoxic condition was conducted in an oxygen-controlled glovebox. To eliminate possible sudden oxygen changes inside the glovebox during sampling, sampling tubes or bottles were placed in a passbox connected to the glovebox (Fig. 1D). After maintaining the oxygen condition inside the passbox and glovebox, the water was subsampled using sampling tubes or bottles that were moved from the passbox to the main chamber of the glovebox.
A 20-mL aliquot of the 50-mL subsampled water was fixed using 5% Lugol’s solution and stored in polyethylene vials for comparative microscopic observation and cell enumeration. To determine whether detected amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) truly represent actual cells, micrographs were taken and cell enumerations were performed. For cell micrograph analysis, samples were placed on confocal dishes with a cover glass at 1,000× magnification using a digital camera (Zeiss Axiocam 506 and Zeiss Axiocam 820 color; Carl Zeiss Ltd., Göttingen, Germany) attached to an inverted light microscope (NFEC-2024-12-301531; Zeiss Axiovert 200M and Zeiss Axio Observer 7; Carl Zeiss Ltd.). For cell enumeration, dominant dinoflagellates, diatoms, ciliates, and cercozoans under the hypoxic condition on day 7 were determined by counting >200 cells or all cells in triplicate 1-mL Sedgwick Rafter chambers under a compound microscope. Only morphologically intact cells were carefully counted.
Another 20-mL aliquot of the 50-mL subsampled water was filtered through a GF/F membrane filter (Whatman Inc., Clifton, NJ, USA), and the filtrate in polyethylene vials was used for nutrient analyses. The concentrations of NO3 + NO2 (hereafter NO3), NH4 (ammonium), PO4, and SiO2 were measured using a 4-channel nutrient auto-analyzer (QuAAtro; Seal Analytical GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany) (Ok et al. 2021).
Subsequently, the filter was placed in a 15-mL conical tube, and 10 mL of 90% acetone was added. Then, the tubes were sonicated for 10 min, wrapped in aluminum foil, and stored in a 4°C chamber overnight. Afterwards, the tubes were then centrifuged to pipe 5 mL of the supernatant to measure chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentration using a 10-AU Turner fluorometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
A 10-mL aliquot of the 50-mL subsampled water was placed on a Petri dish, and living organisms were roughly observed to decide which samples should be analyzed for metabarcoding. Samples taken on days 0, 3, and 7 were decided to be used for metabarcoding analysis because notable changes in protist composition were observed between consecutive-day samples. Moreover, two consecutive single-cell isolations were performed on dinoflagellates and diatoms under the hypoxic condition on day 7 to establish clonal cultures.
For eDNA, an additional 500-mL aliquot was taken from each experimental 5-L Duran bottle and was filtered using 25-mm GF/C membrane filters (Whatman Inc.) (Ok et al. 2023a).

DNA extraction, sequencing, and sequence analysis

The eDNA in the membrane filters was extracted using a DNeasy PowerSoil Pro kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The extracted eDNA was then quantified using a Qubit fluorometer with Quant-IT PicoGreen (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), and stored at −20°C until polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could be performed.
Metabarcoding libraries were generated using a two-step PCR method as detailed by Ok et al. (2023a). Briefly, a sequencing library was prepared to amplify the target genes using the Illumina metagenomic sequencing library protocols (San Diego, CA, USA). For the first PCR, the 5 ng of genomic DNA was amplified with a 5× reaction buffer, 1 mM dNTP mix, and 500 nM of universal primers (forward primer TAReuk454FWD1, 5′-CCAGCASCYGC GGTAATTCC-3′ and reverse primer V4 18S Next.Rev, 5′-ACTTTC GTTCTTGATYRATGA-3′) targeting the V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene for protists (Stoeck et al. 2010, Piredda et al. 2017), with Herculase II fusion DNA polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). After the first PCR was conducted according to the methods in Ok et al. (2023a), the amplicons were purified using AMPure beads (Agencourt Bioscience, Beverly, MA, USA). Then, using 10 μL of the first PCR product with NexteraXT Indexed Primers, the second PCR was performed under the same conditions with the exception that 10 cycles were run instead of 25 cycles. The purified products were quantified using quantitative PCR following the protocols of the KAPA Library Quantification kits for Illumina sequencing platforms. It was qualified using a TapeStation D1000 ScreenTape (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Paired-end sequencing was conducted using an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina) at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea).
Raw sequencing data from Illumina MiSeq were sorted by sample using index sequences, generating paired-end FASTQ files for each sample. After sequencing, Cutadapt (ver. 3.2) was used to remove the adapter and primer sequences and trim both forward (Read 1) and reverse (Read 2) reads to 240 and 200 bp, respectively. DADA2 software package (ver. 1.18.0) was used to correct errors by excluding sequencing with an expected error rate ≥2 in the amplicon sequencing data (Callahan et al. 2016). Erroneous reads were denoised using the established error model for each batch. Paired-end sequences were assembled into single sequences, chimeras were removed using the DADA2 Consensus method with the remove BimeraDenovo function, and ASVs were clustered. Normalization was performed by subsampling based on the lowest number of reads across all samples using QIIME (ver. 1.9.0) software (Caporaso et al. 2010). BLAST+ (ver. 2.9.0) was used for the taxonomic assignment of each ASV sequence using a reference database (Camacho et al. 2009). ASVs were not assigned if the query coverage or identity was <85%. ASVs that were not assigned to the species level in the PR2 database after using BLAST+ were further annotated using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. ASVs assigned to metazoans were omitted from further analyses. Raw sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive (accession No. PRJNA1218482).

Statistical analysis

Two-tailed independent-sample t-tests were conducted to determine the differences between the initial chemical properties under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 29.0 (IBM-SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA), with p-value <0.05 as a statistical significance criterion.

RESULTS

Physical, chemical, and biological properties during the incubation period

Throughout the incubation period, DO, pH and water temperature were maintained at the target levels under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Table 1, Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the initial concentrations of Chl-a, NO3, NH4, PO4, and SiO2 under the normoxic condition were not statistically different from those under the hypoxic condition (two-tailed t-tests; p = 0.53, p = 0.17, p = 0.06, p = 0.72, and p = 0.30, respectively) (Table 1, Fig. 2B). Thus, only the DO levels under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions differed.
The Chl-a concentration (mean ± standard error) under the normoxic condition increased from 34.7 ± 0.8 on day 0 to 58.8 ± 5.4 μg L−1 on day 7, while that under the hypoxic condition increased from 37.9 ± 3.4 to 81.9 ± 21.6 μg L−1 (Table 1, Fig. 2B). Over the incubation period, the concentrations of NO3, NH4, PO4, and SiO2 in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions almost continuously decreased.

Comparison of protistan community structures under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions

Across all the samples, 54,588 ± 1,481 reads per sample were obtained from sequencing the V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene. A total of 1,280 ASVs were detected and 1,058 ASVs were assigned, corresponding to 26 annotated phyla and 398 assigned species (Supplementary Table S1).
Among the phyla, the relative ASV abundances in Dinoflagellata under both oxygen conditions were the highest on all days (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table S2). The relative ASV abundances of Perkinsozoa, Cercozoa, Bigyra, and Chlorophyta increased under normoxia from day 0 to day 7, whereas that of other phyla declined or remained similar (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table S2). Under hypoxia, the relative ASV abundances of Cercozoa and Ochrophyta increased under hypoxia from day 0 to day 7, whereas that of other phyla declined or remained similar (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table S2).
On day 0, the relative read abundance of Dinoflagellata under both conditions was the highest (Fig. 3B, Supplementary Table S3). On day 3, the relative read abundances of Perkinsozoa increased under both conditions and were the highest. However, on day 7, the relative read abundance of Perkinsozoa was the highest under the normoxic condition, whereas that of Cercozoa was the highest under the hypoxic condition.

Comparison of Dinoflagellata community structures under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions

Among the dinoflagellate orders, the relative ASV abundances of the order Syndiniales under both oxygen conditions were the highest on days 0 and 3, whereas that of the order Peridiniales were the highest on day 7 (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Table S4). The relative ASV abundance of Prorocentrales increased under hypoxia but decreased under normoxia from day 0 to day 7 (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Table S4).
On day 0, without unassigned taxa, the relative read abundances of the orders Gymnodiniales and Prorocentrales under the normoxic condition were the highest and second highest, respectively, but they were very similar (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Table S5). However, on day 7, the relative read abundance of the order Suessiales was the highest under the normoxic condition, whereas that of the order Prorocentrales was the highest under the hypoxic condition. The survival of species belonging to the order Prorocentrales under the hypoxic condition was confirmed by microscopic observations (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Dinoflagellate species detected and their trophic modes under the hypoxic condition

In total, 272 dinoflagellate ASVs were assigned to the phylum Dinoflagellata in the present study. In all the samples, 46 species were taxonomically identified at the species level (Tables 2 & 3). Among the 46 identified species, 31 were detected under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions, 11 under the normoxic condition only, and four under the hypoxic condition only on days 0, 3, and 7 (Tables 2 & 3). Prior to the experiment, species detected on day 0 had been exposed to their respective oxygen conditions through a two-day preliminary incubation. Thus, under the normoxic condition, 42 species were taxonomically identified, whereas 35 species were identified under the hypoxic condition on days 0, 3, and 7.
In terms of the relative ASV abundance of dinoflagellates, without unassigned order, the proportion of parasitic dinoflagellates was the highest under both oxygen conditions on days 0, 3, and 7 (Fig. 5A). Under the normoxic condition, the proportion of phototrophic dinoflagellates (autotrophic or mixotrophic, not yet identified) was the second highest on days 0, 3, and 7. Under the hypoxic condition, the proportion of mixotrophic dinoflagellates was the second highest on days 0 and 7.
In the relative read abundance of dinoflagellates under the normoxic condition, the proportion of mixotrophic dinoflagellates was the highest on day 0, whereas that of phototrophic dinoflagellates was the highest on days 3 and 7 (Fig. 5B). In the relative read abundance of dinoflagellates under the hypoxic condition, the proportion of mixotrophic dinoflagellates was the highest on days 0, 3, and 7 (Fig. 5B).
The number of taxonomically identified dinoflagellate species that were detected on day 7 was 16 under the normoxic condition and 14 under the hypoxic condition (Tables 2 & 3). Under the normoxic condition, the trophic modes of the identified dinoflagellate species on day 7 were one exclusively autotrophic, nine phototrophic, four mixotrophic, one kleptoplastidic taxon, and one heterotrophic. However, under the hypoxic condition, the trophic modes of the identified dinoflagellate species on day 7 were one exclusively autotrophic, six phototrophic, three mixotrophic, one kleptoplastidic taxon, and three heterotrophic.

Enumeration of cell density and establishment of clonal cultures of dominant protistan taxa under hypoxia on day 7

As the relative ASV abundances cannot directly confirm the presence or abundance of actual cells, the dominant protistan taxa under the hypoxic condition on day 7 were further quantified under a compound microscope. Among dinoflagellates, Prorocentrum triestinum exhibited the highest cell density, followed by Biecheleria-like spp. (Table 4). Other dinoflagellates such as Gyrodinium spp. and Scrippsiella sp. were also observed under the compound microscope. Among diatoms, Skeletonema spp. showed the highest density, followed by Psammodictyon-like species. Other diatoms, including Cylindrotheca closterium, Thalassiosira spp., Pseudo-nitzschia spp., and Chaetoceros spp., were also present. Ciliates, including the loricate ciliate Eutintinnus sp. and naked ciliates of various sizes, and cercozoans, including Vampyrella-like sp., were also observed. In addition, cells of two dinoflagellate species (Prorocentrum triestinum and Scrippsiella acuminata) and three diatom species (Chaetoceros curvisetus, Cylindrotheca closterium, and Skeletonema japonicum) were isolated from the water incubated under the hypoxic condition on day 7 and successfully established as clonal cultures (Supplementary Fig. S2). Each species was identified based on the internal transcribed spacer and large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences.

DISCUSSION

The present study is the first to explore temporal changes in the structure of protist communities in field-collected water incubated for one week under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions using a metabarcoding method. Previous studies typically collected water samples from different depths, usually normoxic water near the surface and hypoxic water near the bottom, or on different dates, with normoxic water collected on one day and hypoxic water on another (Rocke et al. 2013, 2016, Santoferrara et al. 2022, Ok et al. 2023a). Therefore, it has been difficult to determine which groups or species are genuinely affected by hypoxia because protist communities in waters collected from different depths or times are not identical. Moreover, previous studies could not establish a clear trend in the changes in the structure of protist communities because the communities observed under the hypoxic conditions in the field were not the same as those observed under the normoxic conditions. In contrast, the incubation of the collected water in the present study allowed us to explore trends in changes to the structure of protist communities because no species could enter or escape from the experimental bottles. Furthermore, incubating collected water samples containing nearly identical protist communities under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions enabled us to understand the effects of hypoxia on community structure under the same physicochemical conditions. This approach effectively excludes the influence of factors other than hypoxia. Moreover, the method used in the present study allowed us to determine which species or groups within the protist community were affected by hypoxia.
The present study investigated the temporal changes in the community structure of marine protists under the oxygen-depleted condition over a period of 7 days. However, on day 7, the concentrations of PO4 and SiO2 declined to low levels, potentially affecting the protist community dynamics. This low nutrient concentration may have limited the growth and survival of specific protist groups such as diatoms, particularly dependent on PO4 and SiO2. Thus, shifts in community composition observed on day 7 could be influenced not only by oxygen depletion but also by nutrient limitation. Therefore, careful consideration of this experimental condition on day 7 is needed when interpreting the findings.

Comparison of protist groups and species under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions

On day 7, under the hypoxic condition, Dinoflagellata, Cercozoa, and Ochrophyta accounted for the majority of the relative ASV abundance. Both relative ASV abundance and read abundance of Cercozoa and Ochrophyta under the hypoxic condition increased during seven-day incubation. Cercozoa has been found in the hypoxic waters and sediments of the world’s oceans (Table 5) (Stock et al. 2009, Kalu et al. 2023, Ok et al. 2023a). In particular, Cercozoa has been reported to be abundant in marine benthic and interstitial communities (Pawlowski et al. 2011, Harder et al. 2016), suggesting that they may be resilient to low-oxygen environments. The present study showed that the read abundance of the cercozoan Pseudopirsonia mucosa was the highest among cercozoans under the hypoxic condition on day 7 (Table 5). P. mucosa is known to be a parasitic protist that infects various diatoms (Kühn et al. 2004). Thus, its highest proportion in hypoxic waters on day 7 may be partially related to the increase in the relative read abundance of Ochrophyta, the majority of which were diatoms (Supplementary Table S1). Moreover, the presence of this species under the hypoxic condition has not been previously reported. Thus, the present study added P. mucosa to the list of species that are dominant under the hypoxic condition.
In terms of relative read abundance, the top five species in Ochrophyta under the hypoxic condition belonged to diatoms according to the present and previous study (Table 5) (Ok et al. 2023a). They can tolerate hypoxia by producing oxygen. Few studies have been conducted on the effects of hypoxia on diatom growth (Wu et al. 2012, Chen et al. 2025). The growth rate of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii increased under hypoxia with an increased net photosynthetic rate (Sun et al. 2022). The growth rates of diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana and Skeletonema costatum were affected by hypoxia; however, the rates were still positive at the DO concentration of 1.3 mg L−1 for T. pseudonana, and 0.5 and 2 mg L−1 for S. costatum, respectively (Wu et al. 2012). The results of the present study provide information on diatoms which can tolerate and even show higher growth rates under hypoxia, and further studies on the growth rate of the other dominant diatoms Thalassiosira tenera, Psammodictyon panduriforme, and Minidiscus variabilis are needed.
In Perkinsozoa, the relative read abundance of the dominant species Parvilucifera infectans increased under both oxygen conditions on day 3, but decreased on day 7. Parvilucifera infectans is an endoparasitoid that infects a wide range of dinoflagellates, including those from Dinophysiales, Gonyaulacales, Gymnodiniales, Peridiniales, and Suessiales (Garcés et al. 2013, Alacid et al. 2015). The decline in the relative read abundance of Dinoflagellata under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions on day 3 co-occurred with the increase in the relative read abundance of Perkinsozoa. This result suggests that P. infectans might have been actively infecting and potentially reducing dinoflagellate populations. However, on day 7, the population of the parasitic P. infectans declined under both the oxygen conditions, possibly due to a lack of available dinoflagellate hosts. Furthermore, the relative read abundance of Perkinsozoa on day 7 declined more under the hypoxic condition than under the normoxic condition. P. infectans has not been reported to infect Prorocentrales, including the dominant species in the present study, Prorocentrum triestinum (Garcés et al. 2013). Thus, the high relative read abundance of Prorocentrales on day 7 under hypoxia may have partially contributed to a lower relative read abundance of Perkinsozoa compared to normoxia. To verify this hypothesis, further investigation is needed to determine whether the increase in the Prorocentrum triestinum population affected the decline of Parvilucifera infectans under the hypoxic condition.
Based on relative read abundance on day 0, the dinoflagellate composition differed between the hypoxic and normoxic conditions in the present study. For example, Prorocentrales was the dominant dinoflagellate order under hypoxia, whereas Gymnodiniales dominated under normoxia. This discrepancy may be attributed to the preliminary incubation, which allowed protists to acclimate to their respective oxygen conditions before the experiment. Prorocentrales possess thick thecal plates, which may provide protection against environmental stressors such as the sudden oxygen reduction (Janouškovec et al. 2017). In contrast, Gymnodiniales have relatively thin cell walls, making them less adapted to the sudden transition to hypoxic environments (Janouškovec et al. 2017). To verify this hypothesis, further investigation into the mechanisms that enable Prorocentrales to dominate under hypoxia is needed.
In Dinoflagellata, the relative ASV abundance of the order Peridiniales was the highest under the hypoxic condition on day 7, whereas the relative read abundance of the order Prorocentrales was the highest. Prorocentrum triestinum belonging to Prorocentrales, Scrippsiella precaria and Scrippsiella acuminata belonging to Peridiniales, and Biecheleria brevisulcata and Biecheleria tirezensis belonging to Suessiales ranked in the top five dinoflagellate species in read abundance under the hypoxic condition (Table 5, Supplementary Fig. S1). Prorocentrum triestinum, B. brevisulcata, S. acuminata, and S. precaria have been found in hypoxic seawater (Table 5) (Ok et al. 2023a). Moreover, clonal cultures of P. triestinum and S. acuminata from single-cell isolation were established from day 7 under the hypoxic condition (Supplementary Fig. S2). It is highly possible that B. tirezensis is present in the hypoxic waters of natural environments.
In the present study, 35 dinoflagellate species were detected under the hypoxic condition throughout the entire study period including days 0, 3, and 7. Of these detected species during the entire study period, 16 species were previously known to be present under hypoxia, but 19 species were newly determined (Table 6). These results extend the number of the dinoflagellate species are present under hypoxia. Among the newly discovered dinoflagellates that were present under hypoxia, autotrophic species were two, phototrophic species 12, mixotrophic species one, and heterotrophic species four (Table 6). Furthermore, of these 35 detected dinoflagellate species, 14 were present on day 7, and 6 were newly identified to be detected under the hypoxic condition: one autotrophic, four phototrophic, and one heterotrophic dinoflagellates (Table 6). Thus, some dinoflagellate species remained detectable longer than the others, suggesting differential tolerances to hypoxia. Therefore, careful consideration of the presence of dinoflagellate species in relation to the duration of hypoxia is needed when interpreting the findings. Autotrophic, mixotrophic, phototrophic, and kleptoplastidic dinoflagellates can produce oxygen and may release it into ambient water, which may alleviate hypoxia. Moreover, mixotrophic dinoflagellates are known to survive the hypoxic condition by feeding on their prey. Under the hypoxic condition, the growth rate of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Alexandrium pohangense satiated with prey is positive, whereas that of A. pohangense starved is negative (Eom et al. 2024). Furthermore, Rocke et al. (2016) observed that mixotrophic dinoflagellates became more dominant as the hypoxia intensified, suggesting a shift from autotrophy to phagotrophy. Heterotrophic dinoflagellates can also survive the hypoxic condition by growing on their prey. That is, if the growth rate of a heterotrophic dinoflagellate species feeding on prey exceeds its mortality rate due to hypoxia, the heterotrophic dinoflagellate species can survive. Under hypoxic conditions, the growth rate of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium dominans satiated with prey was positive, whereas that of G. dominans starved was negative (Eom et al. 2024). Therefore, feeding is a critical survival strategy for mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates under the hypoxic condition.
In previous metabarcoding studies, relative ASV abundances have been used to assess marine protist communities (Vasselon et al. 2018, Santoferrara et al. 2022, Ok et al. 2023a). However, the choice of barcoding region, the efficiency and specificity of PCR primers, and the varying completeness of reference databases across protist taxa can result in underestimation or overestimation of ASVs in different protist groups (Pawlowski et al. 2016, Martin et al. 2022). Although the V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene is commonly employed in protist metabarcoding (Kezlya et al. 2023), it may lead to an overestimation of dinoflagellate ASVs, as the high variability in the rDNA regions within cells can result in the detection of multiple ASVs (Stuart et al. 2024). Furthermore, the incompleteness of a diatom barcoding database in the V4 region can lead to an underestimation of diatom ASVs (Pawlowski et al. 2016). In the present study, a higher number of diatom species under the microscopy were enumerated compared to that of dinoflagellate species, although a higher number of dinoflagellate ASVs were detected compared to the diatoms on day 7. This may have been caused by the underestimation and overestimation of ASVs in diatoms and dinoflagellates, respectively. Thus, potential taxonomic biases in metabarcoding results need to be carefully considered. Furthermore, in the present study, the quantitative cell enumeration, microscopic observations, and clonal culture establishment from single-cell isolation and identification of species confirmed that the dominant taxa were composed of morphologically intact cells or viable cells and not cellular debris (Table 4, Supplementary Figs S1 & S2). Therefore, integrating microscopic observation, cell counting, and live cell cultivation with metabarcoding analyses is essential for accurately assessing the protist community structure and distinguishing actual cells from degraded material.
Under the closed condition of the present study, the absence of protist introduction and the progressive accumulation of cellular debris may have affected the detected ASV profile, making it different from natural environments. Therefore, it is important to consider that the present study was conducted in a closed system when interpreting its results in the context of natural environments. Furthermore, in ocean, low pH conditions are frequently associated with hypoxia (Howarth et al. 2011, Gobler and Baumann 2016, Guo et al. 2022). However, in the present study, the low DO condition was established by using N2 + 400 ppm CO2 gas to maintain stable pH levels. This provides an ideal condition for investigating the single effects of hypoxia on protistan community structures. However, the combined effects of hypoxia and acidification resulted in different physiological responses (e.g., survival, growth, photosynthesis, and dark respiration) of a marine protist, the dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae, compared to single hypoxic effect (Bausch et al. 2019). Therefore, when applying the findings of the present study to natural environments, the potential impact of CO2 accumulation should be considered.
The present study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of protist communities under the hypoxic condition. The results of the present study suggest that hypoxia can alter protist community composition. Future research should explore the physiological mechanisms of protist survival under the low-oxygen condition.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (RS-2021-NR058847; RS-2021-NR057869; RS-2023-00291696) award to HJJ and Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (RS-2024-00399598) award to JHO.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Fig. S1.
Micrographs of actual cells fixed in Lugol present under the hypoxic condition on day 7 (https://www.e-algae.org).
algae-2025-40-4-18-Supplementary-Fig-S1.pdf
Supplementary Fig. S2
Micrographs of live cells established as single-cell isolated cultures under the hypoxic condition on day 7 (https://www.e-algae.org).
algae-2025-40-4-18-Supplementary-Fig-S2.pdf
Supplementary Table S1
Detailed taxonomic information on the protist communities analyzed by sequencing the V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene amplicon during the study period (https://www.e-algae.org).
algae-2025-40-4-18-Supplementary-Table-S1.xlsx
Supplementary Table S2. Relative amplicon sequence variants abundance (mean and standard error, %) based on different phyla for each incubation period under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions (https://www.e-algae.org).
Supplementary Table S3. Relative read abundance (mean and standard error, %) based on different phyla for each incubation period under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions (https://www.e-algae.org).
algae-2025-40-4-18-Supplementary-Table-S2,3.pdf
Supplementary Table S4. Relative amplicon sequence variants abundance (mean and standard error, %) based on different orders in Dinoflagellata for each incubation period under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions (https://www.e-algae.org).
Supplementary Table S5. Relative read abundance (mean and standard error, %) based on different orders in Dinoflagellata for each incubation period under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions (https://www.e-algae.org).
algae-2025-40-4-18-Supplementary-Table-S4,5.pdf

Fig. 1
(A) Map of the sampling site of Buksin Bay, off Tongyeong. (B) Schematic of the experimental setup to establish and maintain the normoxic (7.0 mg L−1) and hypoxic (1.5 mg L−1) conditions. (C) Schematic of the gas flow to maintain the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. (D) Step-by-step sampling procedure in passbox connected to the glovebox during experiment.
algae-2025-40-4-18f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Physical, chemical, and biological properties monitored during the incubation period. (A) Dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and water temperature recorded hourly throughout the incubation. (B) The concentrations of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), NO3 (NO2 + NO3), NH4, PO4, and SiO2.
algae-2025-40-4-18f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Relative amplicon sequence variant (ASV) abundance (A) and relative read abundance (B) of all protist phyla under the normoxic (7.0 mg L−1) and hypoxic (1.5 mg L−1) conditions on days 0, 3, and 7. Data represent the mean values at each sampling interval for each oxygen condition.
algae-2025-40-4-18f3.jpg
Fig. 4
Relative amplicon sequence variant (ASV) abundance (A) and relative read abundance (B) of dinoflagellate orders under the normoxic (7.0 mg L−1) and hypoxic (1.5 mg L−1) conditions on days 0, 3, and 7. Data represent the mean values at each sampling interval for each oxygen condition.
algae-2025-40-4-18f4.jpg
Fig. 5
Relative amplicon sequence variant (ASV) abundance (A) and relative read abundance (B) of dinoflagellates classified by the trophic mode (autotrophic, mixotrophic, phototrophic [autotrophic or mixotrophic], kleptoplastidic, parasitic, heterotrophic, and unidentified) under the normoxic (7.0 mg L−1) and hypoxic (1.5 mg L−1) conditions on days 0, 3, and 7.
algae-2025-40-4-18f5.jpg
Table 1
Physical and chemical properties during the incubation period
Normoxia Hypoxia


DO (mg L−1) pH T (°C) Chl-a (μg L−1) NO3 (μM) NH4 (μM) PO4 (μM) SiO2 (μM) DO (mg L−1) pH T (°C) Chl-a (μg L−1) NO3 (μM) NH4 (μM) PO4 (μM) SiO2 (μM)
Overall 7.8 ± 0.0 8.0 ± 0.0 21.5 ± 0.0 - - - - - 1.5 ± 0.0 8.1 ± 0.0 22.3 ± 0.0 - - - - -
0 d - - - 34.7 ± 0.8 82.9 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.3 4.4 ± 0.2 38.8 ± 0.8 - - - 37.9 ± 3.4 86.4 ± 2.1 5.1 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.2 36.6 ± 1.7
3 d - - - 51.7 ± 8.3 65.2 ± 1.2 2.8 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.5 22.2 ± 3.6 - - - 39.4 ± 8.0 69.9 ± 3.6 2.8 ± 0.3 4.0 ± 0.3 23.5 ± 4.4
5 d - - - 44.8 ± 9.2 56.9 ± 3.8 3.1 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.6 7.4 ± 3.7 - - - 40.7 ± 16.4 62.6 ± 4.4 3.0 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.5 14.4 ± 4.9
7 d - - - 58.8 ± 5.4 33.5 ± 9.9 2.5 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.1 - - - 81.9 ± 21.6 52.4 ± 7.3 2.6 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.8 4.1 ± 1.6

DO, dissolved oxygen; NO3, nitrate plus nitrite (NO2 + NO3); NH4, ammonium; PO4, phosphate; SiO2, silicate.

Values are presented as mean ± standard error (n = 3).

Table 2
List of phototrophic dinoflagellates identified to the species level in each sample through metabarcoding analysis, and their corresponding trophic modes
Species Trophic mode Normoxia No. of detection Hypoxia No. of detection Detected condition Reference


0 da 3 d 7 d 0 da 3 d 7 d
Alexandrium satoanum Phototroph + 1 0 N -
Ansanella natalensis Phototroph + 1 0 N -
Gonyaulax cochlea Phototroph + 1 0 N -
Gymnoxanthella radiolariae Phototroph + 1 0 N -
Prorocentrum texanum Phototroph + 1 0 N -
Alexandrium ostenfeldii Mixotroph + 1 0 N Lim et al. (2019)
Scrippsiella sweeneyae Phototroph + 1 0 N -
Alexandrium minutum Mixotroph 0 + 1 H Lim et al. (2019)
Biecheleria baltica Phototroph 0 + 1 H -
Dactylodinium pterobelotum Phototroph 0 + 1 H -
Gonyaulax baltica Phototroph 0 + 1 H -
Akashiwo sanguinea Mixotroph + 1 + 1 B Wu et al. (2021)
Azadinium perforatum Phototroph + 1 + 1 B -
Dinophysis tripos Mixotroph + 1 + 1 B Rodríguez et al. (2012)
Gonyaulax spinifera Mixotroph + 1 + 1 B Jeong et al. (2005b)
Heterocapsa rotundata Mixotroph + 1 + 1 B Millette et al. (2017)
Alexandrium pacificum Autotroph + 1 + + 2 B Lim et al. (2019)
Gymnodinium aureolum Phototroph + 1 + + 2 B -
Sourniaea diacantha Phototroph + + 2 + 1 B -
Paragymnodinium shiwhaense Mixotroph + + + 3 0 N Yoo et al. (2010)
Gymnodinium dorsalisulcum Phototroph + + 2 + + 2 B -
Heterocapsa niei Phototroph + + 2 + + 2 B -
Lepidodinium chlorophorum Phototroph + + 2 + + 2 B -
Gonyaulax whaseongensis Phototroph + + + 3 + + 2 B -
Pyrophacus steinii Phototroph + + + 3 + + 2 B -
Biecheleria brevisulcata Phototroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B -
Biecheleria tirezensis Phototroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B
Biecheleriopsis adriatica Mixotroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B Moestrup et al. (2009)
Prorocentrum triestinum Mixotroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B Jeong et al. (2005b)
Scrippsiella acuminata Mixotroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B You et al. (2023)
Scrippsiella lachrymosa Autotroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B You et al. (2023)
Scrippsiella precaria Phototroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B -
Wangodinium sinense Phototroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B -

The dinoflagellate species in the list were identified based on the amplicon sequence variant data. +, detected; −, not detected; N, species only found under the normoxic condition; H, species only found under the hypoxic condition; B, species both found under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions.

a After a two-day preliminary incubation under the normoxic or hypoxic condition.

Table 3
List of parasitic, kleptoplastidic, and heterotrophic dinoflagellates identified to the species level in each sample through metabarcoding analysis, and their corresponding trophic modes
Species Trophic mode Normoxia No. of detection Hypoxia No. of detection Detected condition Reference


0 da 3 d 7 d 0 da 3 d 7 d
Gyrodinium fusiforme Heterotroph + 1 0 N Naustvoll (2000)
Islandinium tricingulatum Heterotroph + 1 0 N Kawami et al. (2009)
Gyrodinium gutrula Heterotroph + 1 + 1 B Yoon et al. (2012)
Kapelodinium vestifici Heterotroph + 1 + 1 B Boutrup et al. (2016)
Protoperidinium claudicans Heterotroph + 1 + 1 B Mertens et al. (2024)
Protoperidinium thulesense Heterotroph + + 2 0 N Matsuoka et al. (2006)
Euduboscquella crenulata Parasite + + 2 + 1 B Yoo et al. (2023)
Gyrodinium spirale Heterotroph + + 2 + 1 B Hansen (1992)
Protoperidinium pellucidum Heterotroph + + 2 + 1 B Buskey (1997)
Polykrikos kofoidii Heterotroph + + 2 + + 2 B Jeong et al. (2001)
Gyrodinium jinhaense Heterotroph + + 2 + + + 3 B Kang et al. (2020)
Gymnodinium smaydae Kleptoplast + + + 3 + + + 3 B Jeong et al. (2021)
Stoeckeria algicida Heterotroph + + + 3 + + + 3 B Jeong et al. (2005a)

The dinoflagellate species in the list were identified based on the amplicon sequence variant data. +, detected; −, not detected; N, species only found under the normoxic condition; B, species both found under the normoxic and hypoxic conditions.

a After a two-day preliminary incubation under the normoxic or hypoxic condition.

Table 4
Cell density (mean ± standard error, cells mL−1) of morphologically intact cells of dominant dinoflagellates, diatoms, ciliates, and cercozoans under the hypoxic condition on day 7 in the present study
Species Cell density (cells mL−1)
Dinoflagellata Prorocentrum triestinum 1,178 ± 307
Biecheleria-like spp. 113 ± 51
Gyrodinium spp. 60 ± 28
Scrippsiella sp. 11 ± 6
Ochrophyta Skeletonema spp. 19,807 ± 8,360
Psammodictyon-like spp. 1,175 ± 675
Cylindrotheca closterium 1,092 ± 300
Thalassiossira spp. 125 ± 13
Pseudo-nitzschia spp. 75 ± 26
Chaetoceros spp. (10–30 μm) 32 ± 7
Chaetoceros spp. (30–50 μm) 11 ± 7
Ciliophora Eutintinnus sp. 165 ± 73
Naked ciliates (10–30 μm) 85 ± 23
Naked ciliates (30–50 μm) 39 ± 13
Cerocozoa Vampyrella-like sp. 44 ± 2
Table 5
The top five taxa with the highest reads in each phylum under hypoxia using metabarcoding analyses
Phylum or Class Tongyeong, Korea (1.5 mg L−1, day 7) Jinhae, Korea (0.8 mg L−1, bottom waters) Masan, Korea (1.8 mg L−1, bottom waters)
Bigyra MAST-6 X sp. - -
Aplanochytrium sp.
MAST-12A sp.
Monorhizochytrium globosum
Thraustochytriaceae LAB17 sp.
Cercozoa Pseudopirsonia mucosa Protaspa-lineage X sp. Mataza-lineage X sp.
TAGIRI1-lineage X sp. CCW10-lineage X sp. CCW10-lineage X sp.
Ventrifissuridae X sp. Cercozoa XXXX sp. Filosa-Thecofilosea XXX sp.
Mataza-lineage X sp. Ebria tripartita Protaspa-lineage X sp.
Cryothecomonas sp. Marimonadida XX sp. NPK2-lineage X sp.
Chlorophyta Picochlorum sp. Chlamydomonas sp. Dolichomastigaceae-B sp.
Trebouxia sp. Pterosperma sp. Chlamydomonas sp.
RCC391 sp. Chlorophyceae XXX sp. Micromonas pusilla
Pycnococcus sp. Dolichomastigaceae-B sp. Micromonas clade B5
Dolichomastigaceae-B sp. Pyramimonas obovata
Ciliophora Acineta tuberosa Pelagostrobilidium minutum Pelagostrobilidium minutum
Strombidiidae X sp. Tintinnidae X sp. Eutintinnus tubulosus
Sessilida X sp. Helicostomella subulata Litostomatea XXX sp.
Eutintinnus tubulosus Eutintinnus tubulosus Favella panamensis
Lynnella sp. Rhizodomus tagatzi Protogastrostyla pulchra
Cryptista Kathablepharis remigera Leucocryptos marina Katablepharidales XX sp.
Katablepharidales XX sp. Teleaulax sp.
Cryptomonadales XX sp. Cryptophyceae XXX sp.
Katablepharis japonica Leucocryptos marina
Cryptomonadales XX sp.
Dinoflagellata Prorocentrum triestinum Gonyaulax verior Gymnodinium impudicum
Biecheleria brevisulcata Kapelodinium vestifici Amoebophrya sp.
Biecheleria tirezensis Gyrodinium spirale Dinophyceae XXX sp.
Scrippsiella precaria Gymnodinium impudicum Heterocapsa rotundata
Scrippsiella acuminata Gyrodinium sp. Gonyaulax verior
Haptophyta - Chrysochromulina sp. Chrysochromulina sp.
Chrysocampanula spinifera Chrysochromulina strobilus
Chrysochromulina strobilus Chrysocampanula spinifera
Prymnesium sp.
Ochrophyta Psammodictyon sp. Polar-centric-Mediophyceae X sp. Chaetoceros pumilum
Thalassiosira tenera Thalassiosira anguste-lineata Lithodesmium undulatum
Psammodictyon panduriforme Thalassiosira guillardii Thalassiosira lundiana
Minidiscus variabilis Chaetoceros pumilum Thalassiosira anguste-lineata
Skeletonema dohrnii Skeletonema costatum Skeletonema menzellii
Perkinsozoa Parvilucifera infectans - -
Reference This study Ok et al. (2023a) Ok et al. (2023a)

Numbers in parentheses represent the dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg L−1). See Supplementary Fig. S1 for micrographs.

Table 6
List and number of dinoflagellate species detected under the hypoxic condition (1.5 mg L−1) identified in the present study on days 0, 3 and 7 after a two-day preliminary incubation, categorized into previously known and newly discovered groups
Trophic mode Previously known Newly discovered Total No.
Autotrophy - Alexandrium pacificum, Scrippsiella lachrymosa (2) (1) (2) (1)
Phototrophya Scrippsiella precariab, Biecheleria balticab, Biecheleria brevisulcata (3) (2) Azadinium perforatum, Biecheleria tirezensis, Dactylodinium pterobelotum, Gonyaulax baltica, Gonyaulax whaseongensis, Gymnodinium aureolum, Gymnodinium dorsalisulcum, Heterocapsa niei, Lepidodinium chlorophorum, Pyrophacus steinii, Sourniaea diacantha, Wangodinium sinense (12) (4) (15) (6)
Mixotrophy Akashiwo sanguinea, Biecheleriopsis adriatica, Dinophysis tripos, Gonyaulax spinifera, Heterocapsa rotundata, Prorocentrum triestinum, Scrippsiella acuminata (7) (3) Alexandrium minutum (1) (0) (8) (3)
Kleptoplastidy Gymnodinium smaydae (1) (1) - (1) (1)
Parasitism Euduboscquella crenulata (1) (0) - (1) (0)
Heterotrophy Gyrodinium spirale, Kapelodinium vestifici, Polykrikos kofoidii, Stoeckeria algicida (4) (2) Gyrodinium gutrula, Gyrodinium jinhaense, Protoperidinium claudicans, Protoperidinium pellucidum (4) (1) (8) (3)
Reference Shin et al. (2013), Kremp et al. (2018), Ishikawa et al. (2019), Lee et al. (2020), Santoferrara et al. (2022), Ok et al. (2023a) This study

Numbers in parentheses represent the number of species in the list. The dinoflagellate species in the list were identified based on the amplicon sequence variant data. The species present on day 7 were highlighted in bold.

a Either autotrophic or mixotrophic dinoflagellates whose trophic modes have not yet been explored.

b Found in a hypoxic environment in the cyst form.

REFERENCES

Abad, D., Albaina, A., Aguirre, M., et al. 2016. Is metabarcoding suitable for estuarine plankton monitoring? A comparative study with microscopy. Mar. Biol. 163:149. doi.org/10.1007/s00227-016-2920-0
crossref pdf
Alacid, E., Reñé, A. & Garcés, E. 2015. New insights into the parasitoid Parvilucifera sinerae life cycle: the development and kinetics of infection of a bloom-forming dinoflagellate host. Protist. 166:677–699. doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2015.09.001
crossref pmid
Anderson, R., Wylezich, C., Glaubitz, S., Labrenz, M. & Jürgens, K. 2013. Impact of protist grazing on a key bacterial group for biogeochemical cycling in Baltic Sea pelagic oxic/anoxic interfaces. Environ. Microbiol. 15:1580–1594. doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12078
pmid
Azam, F., Fenchel, T., Field, J. G., Gray, J. S., Meyer-Reil, L. A. & Thingstad, F. 1983. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 10:257–263. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226125534-024
crossref
Barsanti, L., Birindelli, L. & Gualtieri, P. 2021. Water monitoring by means of digital microscopy identification and classification of microalgae. Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts. 23:1443–1457. doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00258A
crossref pmid
Bausch, A. R., Juhl, A. R., Donaher, N. A. & Cockshutt, A. M. 2019. Combined effects of simulated acidification and hypoxia on the harmful dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae. Mar. Biol. 166:80. doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3528-y
crossref pdf
Bell, G. W. & Eggleston, D. B. 2005. Species-specific avoidance responses by blue crabs and fish to chronic and episodic hypoxia. Mar. Biol. 146:761–770. doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1483-7
crossref pdf
Boutrup, P. V., Moestrup, Ø, Tillmann, U. & Daugbjerg, N. 2016. Katodinium glaucum (Dinophyceae) revisited: proposal of new genus, family and order based on ultrastructure and phylogeny. Phycologia. 55:147–164. doi.org/10.2216/15-138.1
crossref
Breitburg, D., Levin, L. A., Oschlies, A., et al. 2018. Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science. 359:eaam7240. doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240
crossref pmid
Burki, F., Sandin, M. M. & Jamy, M. 2021. Diversity and ecology of protists revealed by metabarcoding. Curr. Biol. 31:R1267–R1280. doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.066
crossref pmid
Buskey, E. J. 1997. Behavioral components of feeding selectivity of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Protoperidinium pellucidum. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 153:77–89. doi.org/10.3354/meps153077
crossref
Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A. & Holmes, S. P. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 13:581–583. doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., et al. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10:421. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 7:335–336. doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Caron, D. A., Countway, P. D., Jones, A. C., Kim, D. Y. & Schnetzer, A. 2012. Marine protistan diversity. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4:467–493. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142802
crossref pmid
Chen, B., Song, H., Xu, G., Ji, H., Yang, X. & Li, G. 2025. Hypoxia lowers cell carbon and nitrogen content and accelerates sinking of a marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Front. Mar. Sci. 12:1529163. doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1529163
crossref
Clark, H. R. & Gobler, C. J. 2016. Diurnal fluctuations in CO2 and dissolved oxygen concentrations do not provide a refuge from hypoxia and acidification for early-life-stage bivalves. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 558:1–14. doi.org/10.3354/meps11852
crossref
Cohen, N. R., Krinos, A. I., Kell, R. M., et al. 2024. Microeukaryote metabolism across the western North Atlantic Ocean revealed through autonomous underwater profiling. Nat. Commun. 15:7325. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51583-4
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Cuvelier, M. L., Allen, A. E., Monier, A., et al. 2010. Targeted metagenomics and ecology of globally important uncultured eukaryotic phytoplankton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:14679–14684. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001665107
crossref pmid pmc
Diaz, R. J. 2001. Overview of hypoxia around the world. J. Environ. Qual. 30:275–281. doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.302275x
crossref pmid pdf
Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science. 321:926–929. doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401
crossref pmid
Durmuş, T. 2024. Ecological importance, interactions, and functional roles of protists in microbial communities. In : Arslan Aydoğdu EÖ, Doğruöz Güngör N., Haspolat Y. K., editors Mega Alliances with the Micro-worlds: The Harmonious Symphony of Microorganisms with Other Organisms. Orient Publications, Ankara, 34–54.

Edgcomb, V. P. 2016. Marine protist associations and environmental impacts across trophic levels in the twilight zone and below. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31:169–175. doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2016.04.001
crossref pmid
Eom, S. H., Jeong, H. J., Ok, J. H., Park, S. A., Kang, H. C. & You, J. H. 2024. Combined effects of hypoxia and starvation on the survival and growth rates of autotrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic dinoflagellates. Mar. Biol. 171:42. doi.org/10.1007/s00227-023-04363-5
crossref pdf
Forbes, T. L. & Lopez, G. R. 1990. The effect of food concentration, body size, and environmental oxygen tension on the growth of the deposit-feeding polycheate, Capitella species 1. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35:1535–1544. doi.org/10.4319/lo.1990.35.7.1535
crossref pdf
Gaonkar, C. C. & Campbell, L. 2024. A full-length 18S ribosomal DNA metabarcoding approach for determining protist community diversity using Nanopore sequencing. Ecol. Evol. 14:e11232. doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11232
pmc
Garcés, E., Alacid, E., Bravo, I., Fraga, S. & Figueroa, R. I. 2013. Parvilucifera sinerae (Alveolata, Myzozoa) is a generalist parasitoid of dinoflagellates. Protist. 164:245–260. doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2012.11.004

Gilbert, D., Rabalais, N. N., Díaz, R. J. & Zhang, J. 2010. Evidence for greater oxygen decline rates in the coastal ocean than in the open ocean. Biogeosciences. 7:2283–2296. doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2283-2010
crossref
Gobler, C. J. & Baumann, H. 2016. Hypoxia and acidification in ocean ecosystems: coupled dynamics and effects on marine life. Biol. Lett. 12:20150976. doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0976
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Guo, X., Bednaršek, N., Wang, H., Feely, R. A. & Laurent, A. 2022. Acidification and hypoxia in marginal seas. Front. Mar. Sci. 9:861850. doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.861850
crossref
Hansen, P. J. 1992. Prey size selection, feeding rates and growth dynamics of heterotrophic dinoflagellates with special emphasis on Gyrodinium spirale. Mar. Biol. 114:327–334. doi.org/10.1007/BF00349535
crossref pdf
Harder, C. B., Rønn, R., Brejnrod, A., Bass, D., Al-Soud, W. A. & Ekelund, F. 2016. Local diversity of heathland Cercozoa explored by in-depth sequencing. ISME J. 10:2488–2497. doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.31
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Howarth, R., Chan, F., Conley, D. J., et al. 2011. Coupled biogeochemical cycles: eutrophication and hypoxia in temperate estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9:18–26. doi.org/10.1890/100008
crossref pdf
Hwang, J., Kang, H. W., Moon, S. J., Hyung, J.-H., Lee, E. S. & Park, J. 2022. Metagenomic analysis of the species composition and seasonal distribution of marine dinoflagellate communities in four Korean coastal regions. Microorganisms. 10:1459. doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071459
crossref pmid pmc
Ishikawa, A., Wakabayashi, H. & Kim, Y.-O. 2019. A biological tool for indicating hypoxia in coastal waters: calcareous walled-type to naked-type cysts of Scrippsiella trochoidea (Dinophyceae). Plankton Benthos Res. 14:161–169. doi.org/10.3800/pbr.14.161
crossref
Jang, S. H., Lim, P., Torano, O., Neave, E. F., Seim, H. & Marchetti, A. 2022. Protistan communities within the Galapagos archipelago with an emphasis on micrograzers. Front. Mar. Sci. 9:811979. doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.811979

Janouškovec, J., Gavelis, G. S., Burki, F., et al. 2017. Major transitions in dinoflagellate evolution unveiled by phylotranscriptomics. Prog. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114:E171–E180. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614842114

Jeong, H. J., Kang, H. C., Lim, A. S., et al. 2021. Feeding diverse prey as an excellent strategy of mixotrophic dinoflagellates for global dominance. Sci. Adv. 7:eabe4214. doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4214
crossref pmid pmc
Jeong, H. J., Kim, J. S., Kim, J. H., et al. 2005a. Feeding and grazing impact of the newly described heterotrophic dinoflagellate Stoeckeria algicida on the harmful alga Heterosigma akashiwo. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 295:69–78. doi.org/10.3354/meps295069
crossref
Jeong, H. J., Kim, S. K., Kim, J. S., Kim, S. T., Yoo, Y. D. & Yoon, J. Y. 2001. Growth and grazing rates of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Polykrikos kofoidii on red-tide and toxic dinoflagellates. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 48:298–308. doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2001.tb00318.x
crossref pmid
Jeong, H. J., Park, J. Y., Nho, J. H., et al. 2005b. Feeding by red-tide dinoflagellates on the cyanobacterium Synechococcus. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 41:131–143. doi.org/10.3354/ame041131
crossref
Jeong, H. J., Yoo, Y. D., Kim, J. S., Seong, K. A., Kang, N. S. & Kim, T. H. 2010. Growth, feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs. Ocean Sci. J. 45:65–91. doi.org/10.1007/s12601-010-0007-2
crossref pdf
Jeong, H. J., Yoo, Y. D., Lee, K. H., et al. 2013. Red tides in Masan Bay, Korea in 2004–2005: I. Daily variations in the abundance of red-tide organisms and environmental factors. Harmful Algae. 30(Suppl 1):S75–S88. doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.10.008
crossref
Jung, S. W., Kang, D., Kim, H.-J., et al. 2018. Mapping distribution of cysts of recent dinoflagellate and Cochlodinium polykrikoides using next-generation sequencing and morphological approaches in South Sea, Korea. Sci. Rep. 8:7011. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25345-4
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Kalu, E. I., Reyes-Prieto, A. & Barbeau, M. A. 2023. Community dynamics of microbial eukaryotes in intertidal mudflats in the hypertidal Bay of Fundy. ISME Commun. 3:21. doi.org/10.1038/s43705-023-00226-8
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Kang, H. C., Jeong, H. J., Lim, A. S., et al. 2023a. Feeding by common heterotrophic protists on the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Ansanella granifera (Suessiaceae, Dinophyceae). Algae. 38:57–70. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.2.24
crossref pdf
Kang, H. C., Jeong, H. J., Ok, J. H., et al. 2023b. Food web structure for high carbon retention in marine plankton communities. Sci. Adv. 9:eadk0842. doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk0842
crossref pmid pmc
Kang, H. C., Jeong, H. J., Park, S. A., et al. 2020. Feeding by the newly described heterotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium jinhaense: comparison with G. dominans and G. moestrupii. Mar. Biol. 167:156. doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03769-9
crossref pdf
Kawami, H., Van Wezel, R., Koeman, R. P. T. & Matsuoka, K. 2009. Protoperidinium tricingulatum sp. nov. (Dinophyceae), a new motile form of a round, brown, and spiny dinoflagellate cyst. Phycol. Res. 57:259–267. doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.2009.00545.x
crossref
Kezlya, E., Tseplik, N. & Kulikovskiy, M. 2023. Genetic markers for metabarcoding of freshwater microalgae: review. Biology. 12:1038. doi.org/10.3390/biology12071038
crossref pmid pmc
Kim, H., Kim, H., Hwang, H. S. & Kim, W. 2017. Metagenomic analysis of the marine coastal invertebrates of South Korea as assessed by Ilumina MiSeq. Anim. Cells Syst. 21:37–44. doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2016.1271012
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Kim, S.-H., Kim, H. C., Choi, S.-H., et al. 2020. Benthic respiration and nutrient release associated with net cage fish and longline oyster aquaculture in the Geoje-Tongyeong coastal waters in Korea. Estuar. Coasts. 43:589–601. doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00567-5
crossref pdf
Kim, Y. H., Seo, H. J., Yang, H. J., et al. 2023. Protistan community structure and the influence of a branch of Kuroshio in the northeastern East China Sea during the late spring. Front. Mar. Sci. 10:1192529. doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1192529
crossref
Kremp, A., Hinners, J., Klais, R., Leppänen, A.-P. & Kallio, A. 2018. Patterns of vertical cyst distribution and survival in 100-year-old sediment archives of three spring dinoflagellate species from the Northern Baltic Sea. Eur. J. Phycol. 53:135–145. doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1386330
crossref
Kühn, S., Medlin, L. & Eller, G. 2004. Phylogenetic position of the parasitoid nanoflagellate Pirsonia inferred from nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal DNA and a description of Pseudopirsonia n. gen. and Pseudopirsonia mucosa (Drebes) comb. nov. Protist. 155:143–156. doi.org/10.1078/143446104774199556
crossref pmid
Lee, S. Y., Jeong, H. J., Ok, J. H., Kang, H. C. & You, J. H. 2020. Spatial-temporal distributions of the newly described mixotrophic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium smaydae in Korean coastal waters. Algae. 35:225–236. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2020.35.8.25
crossref pdf
Levin, L. A., Ekau, W., Gooday, A. J., et al. 2009. Effects of natural and human-induced hypoxia on coastal benthos. Biogeosciences. 6:2063–2098. doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2063-2009
crossref
Lim, A. S. & Jeong, H. J. 2022. Primary production by phytoplankton in the territorial seas of the Republic of Korea. Algae. 37:265–279. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2022.37.11.28
crossref pdf
Lim, A. S., Jeong, H. J. & Ok, J. H. 2019. Five Alexandrium species lacking mixotrophic ability. Algae. 34:289–301. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2019.34.11.21
crossref pdf
López-Abbate, M. C. 2021. Microzooplankton communities in a changing ocean: a risk assessment. Diversity. 13:82. doi.org/10.3390/d13020082
crossref
Martin, J. L., Santi, I., Pitta, P., John, U. & Gypens, N. 2022. Towards quantitative metabarcoding of eukaryotic plankton: an approach to improve 18S rRNA gene copy number bias. Metabarcoding Metagenom. 6:e85794. doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.6.85794
crossref pdf
Matsuoka, K., Kawami, H., Fujii, R. & Iwataki, M. 2006. Further examination of the cyst-theca relationship of Protoperidinium thulesense (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae) and the phylogenetic significance of round brown cysts. Phycologia. 45:632–641. doi.org/10.2216/05-42.1
crossref
McManus, G. B. & Katz, L. A. 2009. Molecular and morphological methods for identifying plankton: what makes a successful marriage? J. Plankton Res. 31:1119–1129. doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbp061
crossref
Mertens, K. N., Meyvisch, P., Gurdebeke, P., et al. 2024. New investigation of the cyst–motile relationship for Votadinium spinosum reveals a Protoperidinium claudicans species complex (Dinophyceae, Peridiniales). Palynology. 48:2303170. doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2024.2303170
crossref
Millette, N. C., Pierson, J. J., Aceves, A. & Stoecker, D. K. 2017. Mixotrophy in Heterocapsa rotundata: a mechanism for dominating the winter phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62:836–845. doi.org/10.1002/lno.10470
crossref pdf
Mitra, A., Flynn, K. J., Tillmann, U., et al. 2016. Defining planktonic protist functional groups on mechanisms for energy and nutrient acquisition: incorporation of diverse mixotrophic strategies. Protist. 167:106–120. doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003
crossref pmid
Moestrup, Ø, Lindberg, K. & Daugbjerg, N. 2009. Studies on woloszynskioid dinoflagellates V. Ultrastructure of Biecheleriopsis gen. nov., with description of Biecheleriopsis adriatica sp. nov. Phycol. Res. 57:221–237. doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.2009.00541.x
crossref
National Institute of Fisheries Science 2013–2020. Fisheries environment by coastal areas of the South Sea 2013–2020. National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan, 1–330, (in Korean).

National Institute of Fisheries Science 2015–2023. Breaking news: hypoxic water mass, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan, Available from: https://www.nifs.go.kr/board/actionBoard0056List.do. Accessed Mar 1, 2025. (in Korean)

Naustvoll, L.-J. 2000. Prey size spectra in naked heterotrophic dinoflagellates. Phycologia. 39:448–455. doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-39-5-448.1
crossref
Ok, J. H., Jeong, H. J., Kang, H. C., et al. 2023a. Protists in hypoxic waters of Jinhae Bay and Masan Bay, Korea, based on metabarcoding analyses: emphasizing surviving dinoflagellates. Algae. 38:265–281. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.12.6
crossref pdf
Ok, J. H., Jeong, H. J., Lim, A. S., et al. 2023b. Lack of mixotrophy in three Karenia species and the prey spectrum of Karenia mikimotoi (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae). Algae. 38:39–55. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.2.28
crossref pdf
Ok, J. H., Jeong, H. J., You, J. H., et al. 2021. Phytoplankton bloom dynamics in incubated natural seawater: predicting bloom magnitude and timing. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:681252. doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.681252
crossref
Oktavitri, N. I., Kim, J.-O. & Kim, K. 2021. Seasonal variation of microbial diversity of coastal sediment in Tongyeong, South Korea, using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 10:e00446-21. doi.org/10.1128/mra.00446-21
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Park, S. A., Jeong, H. J., Ok, J. H., et al. 2024a. Estimation of bioluminescence intensity of the dinoflagellates Noctiluca scintillans, Polykrikos kofoidii, and Alexandrium mediterraneum populations in Korean waters using cell abundance and water temperature. Algae. 39:1–16. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2024.39.3.10
crossref pdf
Park, S. A., Ok, J. H., Eom, S. H., et al. 2024b. Differential interactions between the bloom-forming dinoflagellates Karenia bicuneiformis and Karenia selliformis and heterotrophic dinoflagellates. Algae. 39:255–275. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2024.39.11.30
crossref pdf
Pawlowski, J., Christen, R., Lecroq, B., et al. 2011. Eukaryotic richness in the abyss: insights from pyrotag sequencing. PLoS ONE. 6:e18169. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018169
crossref pmid pmc
Pawlowski, J., Lejzerowicz, F., Apotheloz-Perret-Gentil, L., Visco, J. & Esling, P. 2016. Protist metabarcoding and environmental biomonitoring: time for change. Eur. J. Prostiol. 55:12–25. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2016.02.003
crossref pmid
Piredda, R., Tomasino, M. P., D’Erchia, A. M., et al. 2017. Diversity and temporal patterns of planktonic protist assemblages at a Mediterranean Long Term Ecological Research site. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93:fiw200. doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw200
crossref pmid
Rabalais, N. N., Díaz, R. J., Levin, L. A., Turner, R. E., Gilbert, D. & Zhang, J. 2010. Dynamics and distribution of natural and human-caused hypoxia. Biogeosciences. 7:585–619. doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-585-2010
crossref
Rappaport, H. B. & Oliverio, A. M. 2023. Extreme environments offer an unprecedented opportunity to understand microbial eukaryotic ecology, evolution, and genome biology. Nat. Commun. 14:4959. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40657-4
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Richmond, C., Marcus, N. H., Sedlacek, C., Miller, G. A. & Oppert, C. 2006. Hypoxia and seasonal temperature: short-term effects and long-term implications for Acartia tonsa Dana. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 328:177–196. doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.07.004
crossref
Rocke, E., Jing, H. & Liu, H. 2013. Phylogenetic composition and distribution of picoeukaryotes in the hypoxic northwestern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. MicrobiologyOpen. 2:130–143. doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.57
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Rocke, E., Jing, H., Xia, X. & Liu, H. 2016. Effects of hypoxia on the phylogenetic composition and species distribution of protists in a subtropical harbor. Microb. Ecol. 72:96–105. doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0751-7
crossref pmid pdf
Rodríguez, F., Escalera, L., Reguera, B., Rial, P., Riobó, P. & da Silva, T. D. J. 2012. Morphological variability, toxinology and genetics of the dinoflagellate Dinophysis tripos (Dinophysiaceae, Dinophysiales). Harmful Algae. 13:26–33. doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.09.012
crossref
Sahu, A., Kumar, N., Singh, C. P. & Singh, M. 2023. Environmental DNA (eDNA): powerful technique for biodiversity conservation. J. Nat. Conserv. 71:126325. doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126325
crossref
Sampaio, E., Santos, C., Rosa, I. C., et al. 2021. Impacts of hypoxic events surpass those of future ocean warming and acidification. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5:311–321. doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01370-3
crossref pmid pdf
Santoferrara, L. F., McManus, G. B., Greenfield, D. I. & Smith, S. A. 2022. Microbial communities (bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes) in a temperate estuary during seasonal hypoxia. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 88:61–79. doi.org/10.3354/ame01982
crossref pdf
Sheng, H., Darby, S. E., Zhao, N., et al. 2024. Anthropogenic eutrophication and stratification strength control hypoxia in the Yangtze Estuary. Commun. Earth Environ. 5:235. doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01403-w
crossref pdf
Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B., Caron, D. A., Vaulot, D. & Worden, A. Z. 2007. Oceanic protists. Oceanography. 20:130–134. doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.57
crossref
Shin, H. H., Jung, S. W., Jang, M.-C. & Kim, Y.-O. 2013. Effect of pH on the morphology and viability of Scrippsiella trochoidea cysts in the hypoxic zone of a eutrophied area. Harmful Algae. 28:37–45. doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.05.011
crossref
Slaveykova, V., Sonntag, B. & Gutiérrez, J. C. 2016. Stress and protists: no life without stress. Eur. J. Protistol. 55:39–49. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2016.06.001
crossref pmid pmc
Stock, A., Jürgens, K., Bunge, J. & Stoeck, T. 2009. Protistan diversity in suboxic and anoxic waters of the Gotland Deep (Baltic Sea) as revealed by 18S rRNA clone libraries. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 55:267–284. doi.org/10.3354/ame01301
crossref
Stoeck, T., Bass, D., Nebel, M., et al. 2010. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 19:21–31. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04480.x
crossref pmid
Stuart, J., Ryan, K. G., Pearman, J. K., Thomson-Laing, J., Hampton, H. G. & Smith, K. F. 2024. A comparison of two gene regions for assessing community composition of eukaryotic marine microalgae from coastal ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 14:6442. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56993-4
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Sun, J.-Z., Wang, T., Huang, R., et al. 2022. Enhancement of diatom growth and phytoplankton productivity with reduced O2 availability is moderated by rising CO2 . Commun. Biol. 5:54. doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03006-7
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Tran, B. T., Kim, K.-Y., Heo, J. S., Park, S.-J., Park, H. K. & Choi, Y. H. 2022. Determination of the Pacific oyster Magallana gigas (Crassostrea gigas) diet composition in two aquaculture farms by fecal DNA metabarcoding. Aquaculture. 552:738042. doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738042
crossref
Vasselon, V., Bouchez, A., Rimet, F., et al. 2018. Avoiding quantification bias in metabarcoding: application of a cell biovolume correction factor in diatom molecular biomonitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9:1060–1069. doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12960
crossref pdf
Whitney, M. M. 2022. Observed and projected global warming pressure on coastal hypoxia. Biogeosciences. 19:4479–4497. doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4479-2022
crossref
Wu, R. S. S. 2002. Hypoxia: from molecular responses to ecosystem responses. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 45:35–45. doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00061-9
crossref pmid
Wu, R. S. S., Wo, K. T. & Chiu, J. M. Y. 2012. Effects of hypoxia on growth of the diatom Skeletonema costatum. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 420–421:65–68. doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.04.003
crossref
Wu, X., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Zhong, P. & Xu, N. 2021. Toxic characteristics and action mode of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea on co-occurring phytoplankton and zooplankton. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 19:404. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010404
crossref pmid pmc
Yoo, J., Coats, D. W. & Kim, S. 2023. Syndinean dinoflagellates of the genus Euduboscquella are paraphyletic. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 70:e12953. doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12953
crossref pmid pdf
Yoo, Y. D., Jeong, H. J., Kang, N. S., et al. 2010. Feeding by the newly described mixotrophic dinoflagellate Paragymnodinium shiwhaense: feeding mechanism, prey species, and effect of prey concentration. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 57:145–158. doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00448.x
crossref pmid
Yoo, Y. D., Jeong, H. J., Kim, J. S., et al. 2013. Red tides in Masan Bay, Korea in 2004–2005: II. Daily variations in the abundance of heterotrophic protists and their grazing impact on red-tide organisms. Harmful Algae. 30(Suppl 1):S89–S101. doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.10.009
crossref
Yoon, E. Y., Kang, N. S. & Jeong, H. J. 2012. Gyrodinium moestrupii n. sp., a new planktonic heterotrophic dinoflagellate from the coastal waters of western Korea: morphology and ribosomal DNA gene sequence. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 59:571–586. doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00632.x
pmid
You, J. H., Jeong, H. J., Park, S. A., Eom, S. H., Kang, H. C. & Ok, J. H. 2024. Effects of aeration and centrifugation conditions on omega-3 fatty acid production by the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium smaydae in a semi-continuous cultivation system on a pilot scale. Algae. 39:109–127. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2024.39.6.7
crossref pdf
You, J. H., Ok, J. H., Kang, H. C., Park, S. A., Eom, S. H. & Jeong, H. J. 2023. Five phototrophic Scrippsiella species lacking mixotrophic ability and the extended prey spectrum of Scrippsiella acuminata (Thoracosphaerales, Dinophyceae). Algae. 38:111–126. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.6.6
crossref pdf
Zhu, C.-D., Wang, Z.-H. & Yan, B. 2013. Strategies for hypoxia adaptation in fish species: a review. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 183:1005–1013. doi.org/10.1007/s00360-013-0762-3
crossref pmid pdf
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplement Supplement1
Supplement Supplement2
Supplement Supplement3
Supplement Supplement4
Supplement Supplement5
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
329
View
32
Download
Related article
Editorial Office
[14348] A-1716, Gwangmyeong Trade Center, 72 Iljik-ro Gwangmyeong-si. Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Tel: +82-2-899-5980  Fax: +82-2-899-5922    E-mail: editalgae@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Phycology.                 Developed in M2PI