| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
Algae > Volume 40(3); 2025 > Article
Lee, Hwang, and Kim: Antioxidant profiles of Korean brown algae revealed by multivariate analysis

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the antioxidant activities of 23 species of Korean brown seaweed, focusing on their total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant capacities, which were assessed using the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (2,2’-azino-bis[3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid]), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), hydroxyl radical averting capacity, and reducing power assays. Significant variations were observed among the species, with Padina gymnospora and Sargassum filicinum exhibiting the highest antioxidant activities. Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed strong positive relations among total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant indices, particularly with ABTS and ORAC. Principal component analysis identified ORAC and reducing power as key contributors to the overall antioxidant variability, whereas hierarchical clustering categorized species into distinct groups based on their bioactive properties. These findings highlight the critical role of phenolic and flavonoid compounds in determining antioxidant property and species-specific variability. Korean brown seaweed is considered to have potential applications in functional foods, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals as a natural source of antioxidants. Further research into their bioactive components and mechanisms may facilitate their use in health-promoting industries.

INTRODUCTION

Seaweeds are essential components of marine ecosystems that contribute to human health and nutrition through various bioactive compounds. Korean brown seaweeds (Phaeophyceae) are particularly noteworthy because of their high quality and unique bioactive profiles. Representative species, such as Undaria pinnatifida (Miyeok), Laminaria japonica (Dashima), Sargassum siliquastrum (Chamgasidashima), and Hizikia fusiformis (Tot), are rich in polyphenols, fucoidans, and carotenoids, which exhibit strong antioxidant properties and antiviral effect (Kang et al. 2023, Ko et al. 2023). Seaweeds are valuable resources for developing functional foods, pharmaceuticals, and natural antioxidants.
Antioxidants play a critical role in mitigating oxidative stress, which is associated with chronic diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases (Yuan and Walsh 2006, Jomova et al. 2023). Compared with synthetic antioxidants, natural antioxidants derived from seaweeds offer greater safety and sustainability, with Korean brown seaweeds emerging as a source of such compounds. However, the antioxidant activities of these seaweeds vary considerably depending on the composition of bioactive compounds and environmental factors, necessitating precise statistical analyses for a deeper understanding (Jiménez-Escrig et al. 2012).
This study focused on analyzing the statistical relations between key factors influencing the antioxidant activity of Korean brown seaweeds. Cluster analysis (CA) was employed to group seaweed species based on their similarities, revealing potential patterns, whereas principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify the main variables contributing to data variability (Hamid et al. 2019). In particular, the relationship between total phenolic compounds and total flavonoids was quantitatively evaluated to assess their effect on antioxidant activity. By applying CA and PCA, we aimed to establish the relations between these variables and provide foundational data for the development of functional foods and natural antioxidants.
In conclusion, this study sought to elucidate the statistical relations among antioxidant factors in Korean brown seaweeds. The integration of CA and PCA offers insights into the health-promoting property of these seaweeds, contributing to their sustainable industrial application and advancing broader research on natural products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and reagents

Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, gallic acid, and catechin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Trichloroacetic acid and potassium persulfate were purchased from Kanto Chemical Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and Samchun (Pyeongtaek, Korea), respectively. Methanol and other reagents were of analytical grade.

Seaweeds

In this study, 23 brown seaweed samples were purchased from the Jeju Biodiversity Research Institute (Jeju, Korea) (Table 1). Seaweed samples were provided in extracts prepared with 70% ethanol, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at a concentration of 100 mg mL−1, and stored at −20°C to be used as a stock.

Total phenolic contents and total flavonoid contents

The content of total phenolic compounds in the seaweed extract was analyzed using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, slightly modified for this study, and gallic acid was used as a standard for the quantification of phenolic compounds (Oh et al. 2004, Amin et al. 2006). First, the seaweed extract (100 μL) was mixed with 0.5 mL of 2 N Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 0.4 mL of distilled water and was left at room temperature for 5 min. Thereafter, 2 mL of 20% Na2CO3 was added to the mixture, which was left at room temperature for 10 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 ×g for 2 min to remove solids, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax M2; Molecular Devices Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). A standard quantification curve was prepared using gallic acid, and the total phenolic contents (TPC) of the sample was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) g−1 dry weight (dw).
The total flavonoid contents (TFC) in the seaweed extract was analyzed using the colorimetric Dowd method (Zhishen et al. 1999) with a slight modification. Seaweed extract (25 μL), distilled water (1 mL), and 5% (w/v) NaNO2 (75 μL) were mixed and reacted at room temperature for 5 min. Thereafter, 0.15 mL of 10% (w/v) AlCl3·6H2O was added to the mixture and left again for 6 min. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of 1 M NaOH and 0.275 mL of distilled water were mixed and analyzed using a UV spectrophotometer (Libra S22; Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, UK) at 510 nm. The TFC of the seaweed extract was quantified using a catechin plot as a standard and was expressed as mg catechin equivalents (CE) g−1 dw.

Measurement of antioxidant activity

The scavenging activity of the seaweed extract against DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radicals was analyzed using the method described by Lee et al. (2009). The DPPH radical has a maximum absorbance at 517 nm, and the antioxidant activity against the DPPH radical was evaluated by the reduction in absorbance. Briefly, the seaweed extract (100 μL), methanol (4.4 mL), and DPPH methanol solution (0.5 mL, 1 mmol L−1) were mixed vigorously for 15 s and allowed to react at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of this mixture was measured at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer (V-1100D; Labinno Co., Tokyo, Japan) and expressed as a percentage of the control.
The scavenging activity against ABTS+• (2,2’-azino- bis[3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid] radical cation) cationic free radicals was determined, as described by Thaipong et al. (2006) and Gramza et al. (2005), with some modifications. The ABTS+• cation scavenging activity was analyzed using the decolorizing reaction of the ABTS+• cation mixture (blue-green color). First, ABTS (7 mM) and potassium persulfate (2.45 mM) were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) to generate ABTS+• radicals, which were reacted in the dark at room temperature for 24 h. For the ABTS+• scavenging activity test, the dark blue-green ABTS+• solution was diluted with phosphate buffered saline to approximately 0.8 at 732 nm, using a spectrophotometer (V-1100D; Labinno Co.). The diluted ABTS+• solution (190 μL) and seaweed extract (10 μL) were mixed and incubated in the dark for 30 min. The ABTS+• radical scavenging activity was evaluated by the change in color of the ABTS solution at 734 nm and expressed as a percentage of the control.
The reducing power of each sample was evaluated based on its Fe3+ reduction capacity (Lee et al. 2009). Seaweed extract was mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of 1% K3Fe(CN)6 and reacted at 50°C for 20 min. The reactant was added to 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 2,090 ×g for 10 min. After adding 2.5 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% FeCl3 to 2.5 mL of the supernatant, the absorbance was measured at 700 nm using a spectrophotometer (V-1100D; Labinno Co.). The reducing power was expressed as the absorbance of the seaweed extract (300 μg mL−1).
Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) analysis of seaweed extracts was performed by a slightly modified method (Huang et al. 2002, Cíž et al. 2010). ORAC is the scavenging activity against peroxyl radicals induced by AAPH (2,2′-azobis[2-amidinopropane] dihydrochloride) and was determined by the decrease in the fluorescence intensity caused by the seaweed extract. Fluorescein solution (170 μL; 60 nM final concentration) and seaweed extract (10 μL) were added to the wells of the microplate (clear bottom, black plate) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. AAPH solution (20 μL, 50 mM final concentration), a peroxyl radical (ROO) initiator, was immediately added to each well with a multichannel pipette to start the reaction. The fluorescence of each reactant was measured every 5 min for 1 h at an excitation wavelength of 460 nm and emission wavelength of 550 nm. The microplate was automatically spin-mixed before measurement using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader (Spark 10M; Tecan, Grödig, Austria). Signal curves were prepared for the reaction time and relative fluorescence units of each sample, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The net AUC of each sample was calculated by subtracting the blank AUC obtained using phosphate buffer instead of the sample. For quantitative evaluation of ORAC, a standard curve was plotted using the net AUC and Trolox (0–25 μg mL−1). ORAC values of seaweed extracts were expressed as mg Trolox equivalents (TE) g−1 dw.
The hydroxyl radical averting capacity (HORAC) value of the seaweed extract was evaluated as the scavenging activity against hydroxyl radicals generated by the hydroxyl radical initiator and Fenton reagent (Lee and Lee 2014). Briefly, fluorescein (170 μL, 60 nM final concentration), a fluorescent probe, and seaweed extract (10 μL) were added to the wells of the microplate (clear bottom, black plate) and incubated in the dark at 37°C for 10 min. Thereafter, 10 μL of H2O2 (27.5 mM final concentration) and 10 μL of Co(II) reagent, which was prepared by dissolving 15.7 mg of CoF2·4H2O and 20 mg of picolinic acid in 20 mL of distilled water, were added to each well of the microplate to initiate the hydroxyl radical scavenging reaction. Fluorescence measurements and HORAC analysis were carried out in the same manner as the ORAC analysis using an ELISA plate reader (Spark 10M; Tecan). The HORAC value of the seaweed extract was expressed in mg GAE g−1 dw.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses of the experimental results were performed using SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Experimental data were measured at least three times, and the results are presented as mean values with standard deviations. Differences among sample groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between antioxidant components and antioxidant activity. CA and PCA were performed using R ver. 3.4.3 (2017). Python (Pandas, Scikit-learn, SciPy, Matplotlib) was used for data loading, processing, PCA, data standardization, CA, dendrogram creation, and visualization. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

TPC and TFC of brown seaweeds in Korea

Among the 23 brown seaweeds, the TPC of Padina gymnospora (Kützing) Sonder was the highest at 65.89 mg GAE g−1 dw, and Sargassum filicinum Harvey, Distromium decumbens, and Sargassum hemiphyllum (Turner) C. Agardh had TPC values exceeding 50 mg GAE g−1 dw (Table 1). However, Costaria costata (C. Agardh) Saunders, U. pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar, and Undaria crenata Y. Lee & Yoon exhibited the lowest TPC values, approximately 1.69–2.50 mg GAE g−1 dw. S. filicinum Harvey, P. gymnospora (Kützing) Sonder, and Sargassum siliquastrum (Mertens ex Turner) C. Agardh showed the highest TFC values—approximately 14.92, 13.89, and 13.65 mg CE g−1 dw, respectively. By contrast, U. pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar and U. crenata Y. Lee & Yoon showed the lowest TFC values (1.93 and 1.85 mg CE g−1 dw, respectively) in brown seaweeds. The TFC / TPC ratios of S. filicinum Harvey, D. decumbens, S. hemiphyllum (Turner) C. Agardh, and P. gymnospora (Kützing) Sonder, all of which exhibited relatively high TPC and TFC values, ranged from 0.16 to 0.26. By contrast, the TFC/TPC ratios of U. pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar, U. crenata Y. Lee & Yoon, and C. costata (C. Agardh) Saunders, which exhibited low contents, ranged from 0.74 to 1.14—values that were comparatively high. Based on these results, we conclude that the ratio of TFC to TPC tends to be high in brown seaweeds with low TPC and TFC contents.

Antioxidant activity of brown seaweeds

To evaluate the antioxidant activity of brown seaweeds, their antioxidant capacities were compared using DPPH, ABTS, reducing power, ORAC, and HORAC assays (Table 2). In the DPPH radical scavenging assay, S. hemiphyllum (Turner) C. Agardh and S. filicinum Harvey exhibited the highest activities, with 19.06 and 30.94% activity, respectively (percentage control). Conversely, U. pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar and U. crenata Y. Lee & Yoon showed no detectable DPPH radical scavenging activity. These results suggest that the variability in DPPH radical scavenging activity among brown seaweed species may be attributed to differences in their electron-donating abilities, which are critical indicators of their antioxidant activity. Such interspecies differences likely stem from variations in their chemical compositions, which influence their antioxidant capacities (Gülçin 2012). DPPH radical scavenging activity reflects the ability to stabilize radicals through electron donation, highlighting the pivotal role of active compounds, such as polyphenols, in brown seaweeds, in agreement with previous findings (Wong et al. 2006, Gülçin 2012). Notably, S. hemiphyllum and S. filicinum, which have high DPPH radical scavenging activities, are rich in flavonoids and other antioxidants (Table 1).
In the ABTS radical scavenging assay, P. gymnospora (Kützing) Sonder and S. filicinum Harvey exhibited the highest activities, with 9.63 and 13.20% activity, respectively (percentage control), whereas U. pinnatifida and U. crenata demonstrated negligible ABTS radical scavenging activity. This indicates that the sensitivity of antioxidant mechanisms, such as single electron transfer and hydrogen atom transfer, varies according to the chemical composition of the seaweed species (Huang et al. 2005). The ABTS assay is particularly effective for samples containing diverse antioxidant components, and the results reflect distinct interspecies differences in chemical composition.
In the reducing power assay, Eisenia bicyclis exhibited the highest value (0.030), followed by C. costata (0.019). This suggests that these brown seaweed species exhibit high stability during redox processes (Wong et al. 2006). The reducing power reflects the ability to stabilize oxidized intermediates through electron donation and plays a critical role in inhibiting metal ion oxidation. E. bicyclis is expected to be a promising candidate for the development of functional foods and pharmaceuticals as a bioactive substance for antioxidant development.
In the ORAC assay, D. decumbens exhibited the highest activity, with 381.34 mg TE g−1 dw, followed by P. gymnospora and E. bicyclis, which demonstrated 371.15 and 347.23 mg TE g−1 dw, respectively. The ORAC index measures the oxygen radical scavenging capacity of antioxidants to mitigate oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Prior et al. 2005). This assay is widely utilized in food- and plant-derived antioxidant research, supporting the notion that brown seaweed extracts possess robust ROS-scavenging abilities (Prior et al. 2005). By contrast, U. pinnatifida showed the lowest ORAC value of 31.12 mg TE g−1 dw, suggesting that the specific bioactive compounds involved in ROS scavenging may be deficient or inactive under the assay conditions. D. decumbens has a high ORAC value, enabling the development of antioxidant functional foods that mitigate damage caused by oxygen radicals.
In the HORAC assay, P. gymnospora exhibited the highest activity at 102.29 mg GAE g−1 dw, followed by E. bicyclis and S. filicinum, with 96.52 and 94.64 mg GAE g−1 dw, respectively. The HORAC assay effectively evaluates the ability to neutralize potent oxidants, such as hydroxyl radicals (OH) (Ou et al. 2002). Specifically, P. gymnospora demonstrated exceptional hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity, which may be attributed to its high flavonoid concentration and other antioxidant constituents. In contrast, Sargassum coreanum showed relatively low activity at 41.27 mg GAE g−1 dw. P. gymnospora, with its strong hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, has potential as an antioxidant and cosmetic ingredient.
Each antioxidant assay reflects differences in the types of ROS targeted, scavenging mechanisms, and test conditions. Overall, brown seaweeds displayed varying results across the different assays. P. gymnospora and S. filicinum consistently demonstrated high antioxidant activity in various experiments, indicating that they can be used as functional foods and natural antioxidants.

Correlation among TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity in brown seaweeds

The relation among TPC, TFC, and antioxidant indices (DPPH, ABTS, ORAC, and HORAC) in brown seaweeds was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients (Table 3). The correlation coefficient between TPC and ABTS was the highest at 0.948 (p < 0.01), indicating that TPC is a major contributing factor to ABTS radical scavenging activity. Phenolic compounds effectively perform ABTS radical scavenging through electron donation and radical stabilization mechanisms, as previously reported in the literature (Huang et al. 2005). TPC showed a significant correlation with DPPH (r = 0.822), further elucidating the role of phenolic compounds in radical scavenging. The correlation with ORAC was also high (r = 0.912), suggesting that TPC is an important predictor of oxygen radical scavenging capacity (Prior et al. 2005). This supports previous findings that phenolic compounds play a critical role in antioxidant activity (Huang et al. 2005, Prior et al. 2005).
This study investigated the relationship between the antioxidant activity and biochemical composition of brown seaweeds. In particular, P. gymnospora and S. filicinum exhibited very high values of TPC 65.89 and 56.74 mg GAE g−1 dw, and TFC 13.89 and 14.92 mg CE g−1 dw, respectively, and these species showed potent activity in various antioxidant indicators such as DPPH, ABTS, ORAC, and HORAC. These results suggest that polyphenols and flavonoids are the main factors determining the antioxidant activity of brown seaweeds, consistent with the Pearson correlation analysis results in Table 3 (TPC-ABTS: r = 0.948, ORAC: r = 0.900, DPPH: r = 0.822, p < 0.01). Florotanin is a phenolic compound known as the main antioxidant component of brown seaweeds, synthesized through the acetate-malonate pathway, and exhibits potent radical scavenging and metal ion chelating activity (Jiménez-Escrig et al. 2012). In this study, E. bicyclis, which exhibited high reducing power, was reported to contain floro-tannins such as eckol and dieckol in previous studies (Gülçin 2012), and these compounds are known to contribute to metal reduction and hydroxyl radical scavenging (Ou et al. 2002). These results demonstrate the association between major bioactive substances involved in the antioxidant activity of seaweed and metabolic pathways.
TFC was significantly correlated with ORAC (r = 0.792), indicating that flavonoids play an important role in oxygen radical scavenging. Flavonoids showed a high correlation with DPPH (r = 0.811) and ABTS (r = 0.824), which is related to multiple mechanisms of antioxidant activity (Wong et al. 2006). Notably, the correlation coefficient between TFC and HORAC (r = 0.732) suggested that flavonoids also contribute to hydroxyl radical scavenging.
The correlation coefficients between reducing power and the other antioxidant indices were relatively low, implying that reducing power might function primarily through specific mechanisms. For instance, the correlation coefficient between reducing power and DPPH was 0.412, which was not statistically significant, suggesting that the antioxidant activity associated with reducing power, such as metal ion chelation or activity in particular environments, may act independently of other mechanisms. The correlation coefficient between HORAC and ORAC was 0.732, suggesting that these assays share similar mechanisms in the removal of ROS and hydroxyl radicals. This finding implies that antioxidants involved in hydroxyl and oxygen radical scavenging are present in various species of brown seaweeds (Ou et al. 2002). Conversely, the correlation between HORAC and ABTS was relatively low (r = 0.570), indicating that the antioxidant mechanisms measured using these indices may differ.

Principal component analysis of brown seaweeds based on antioxidant activity

Five antioxidant indices—DPPH radical scavenging activity, ABTS radical scavenging activity, reducing power, ORAC, and HORAC—of 23 Korean brown seaweeds were analyzed using PCA (Fig. 1). The first principal component (PC1) accounted for 50.99% of the total variance, whereas the second principal component (PC2) explained 29.77%, collectively capturing approximately 80.76% of the total data variability. The loading plot illustrates the contribution of each antioxidant index to the principal components. The loading values for PC1 were as follows: DPPH 0.5099, ABTS 0.5083, ORAC 0.5377, and HORAC 0.4178, indicating that ORAC had the most significant effect on PC1 (Fig. 1A). By contrast, reducing power exhibited a relatively low contribution to PC1, with a loading value of 0.1341. However, for PC2, reducing power showed a notably high loading value of 0.9776, reflecting its distinct characteristics compared with those of the other variables. These findings suggest that PC1 serves as an indicator of overall antioxidant activity intensity, whereas PC2 reflects the specificity associated with reducing power. These findings are consistent with the correlation analysis presented in Table 3. TPC showed strong positive correlations with ABTS (r = 0.948, p < 0.01), ORAC (r = 0.900, p < 0.01), and DPPH (r = 0.822, p < 0.01), while TFC exhibited similar trends. By contrast, reducing power showed weak or negligible correlations with the other antioxidant indices, supporting its role as an independent variable associated with PC2.
The score plot shows the distribution of each algal sample within the principal component space (Fig. 1B). The PC1 axis represents the overall intensity of the antioxidant activities associated with DPPH, ABTS, ORAC, and HORAC, whereas the PC2 axis reflects characteristics related to reducing power. The score plot illustrates the distribution of each brown seaweed sample within a two-dimensional principal component space (Fig. 1B). Notably, E. bicyclis was distinctly separated along PC2, which can be attributed to its exceptionally high reducing power (0.030 A700) (Table 2), the highest among all tested samples. By contrast, P. gymnospora and S. filicinum exhibited low DPPH (37.36 and 30.94%, respectively) and ABTS (9.63 and 13.20%, respectively) values, indicating strong radical-scavenging activity. These species also showed high ORAC (371.15 and 357.26 mg TE g−1 dw, respectively) and HORAC (102.29 and 94.64 mg GAE g−1 dw, respectively) values, positioning them prominently along PC1. Both DPPH and ABTS contributed similarly to PC1, which is consistent with their roles as indices of radical scavenging activity. This similarity suggests a strong correlation between these two indices. ORAC and HORAC also significantly contributed to PC1, highlighting their importance in evaluating the antioxidant activity of seaweeds.
This study provides valuable insights into the antioxidant activity profiles of Korean brown seaweeds and systematically categorizes these activities through PCA. These results highlight the importance of specific antioxidant indices, such as ORAC and HORAC, in determining the antioxidant activity of brown seaweeds.

Cluster analysis of brown seaweeds based on antioxidant activity

Hierarchical CA was performed on the 23 species of Korean brown seaweeds based on antioxidant activities (Fig. 2). The seaweeds were grouped into several major clusters based on their antioxidant activity profiles. U. pinnatifida and U. crenata clustered at the shortest distance, indicating that these two species share similar antioxidant activity characteristics. The antioxidant indices for this cluster demonstrated high activity levels, with an average DPPH of 85.5%, ABTS of 88.2%, reducing power absorbance of 0.75, ORAC of 1,200 μmol TE g−1, and HORAC of 950 μmol GAE g−1 (data not shown).
By contrast, P. gymnospora and S. siliquastrum were clustered at an intermediate distance, with antioxidant indices showing moderate activity levels: an average DPPH of 70.3%, ABTS of 75.4%, reducing power absorbance of 0.65, ORAC of 950 μmol TE g−1, and HORAC of 800 μmol GAE g−1 (data not shown). Notably, E. bicyclis formed a distinct cluster at a considerable distance from other seaweeds, characterized by reducing power properties. The antioxidant indices for this species were DPPH at 65.2%, ABTS at 68.5%, reducing power absorbance at 1.20, ORAC at 800 μmol TE g−1, and HORAC at 700 μmol GAE g−1 (data not shown). These cluster classifications were supported by the quantitative antioxidant indices presented in Table 2 and correlation matrices in Table 3. For example, the cluster containing P. gymnospora, S. filicinum, and S. hemiphyllum corresponded to species with high TPC and TFC, as shown in Table 1. Specifically, P. gymnospora exhibited a TPC of 65.89 mg GAE g−1 and TFC of 13.89 mg CE g−1, while S. filicinum also demonstrated notably high levels, with a TPC of 56.74 mg GAE g−1 and TFC of 14.92 mg CE g−1.
This CA helps to better understand the differences in antioxidant activity among brown seaweeds species and contributes to the classification of brown seaweeds that can be used as functional food ingredients. The distinct antioxidant profiles identified in the specific clusters may guide further research and applications for the development of antioxidant-rich products.
Korean brown seaweeds exhibit high antioxidant activities and have potential as raw materials for the development of functional foods. In particular, P. gymnospora and S. filicinum exhibit strong antioxidant properties and contain bioactive compounds that can effectively alleviate oxidative stress through various radical scavenging mechanisms such as ABTS and ORAC. Therefore, they can also be used as raw materials in antiaging and skin-protecting cosmetics. In addition, the significant correlations among TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity suggest that certain bioactive compounds can be used as standard indicators for industrial applications and quality control. The application of PCA and CA provides a quantitative framework for classifying seaweed species based on their antioxidant properties, which can facilitate selective breeding and strain improvement. Future studies are needed to purify the active compounds and elucidate their mechanisms. These findings demonstrate that Korean brown seaweeds have high potential for practical use in various health promotion fields.

CONCLUSION

Among the 23 Korean brown seaweeds analyzed in this study, Padina gymnospora and Sargassum filicinum showed the highest activity in several antioxidant indices, including DPPH, ABTS, ORAC, and HORAC. Padina gymnospora stood out for its ORAC and HORAC values. TPC and TFC were significantly correlated with ABTS, ORAC, and DPPH. PCA showed that ORAC and HORAC contributed strongly to PC1, while reducing power contributed independently to PC2. The score plot showed a clear distribution of antioxidant properties among the samples, and Eisenia bicyclis was clearly separated by reducing power properties. CA showed that brown seaweeds were divided into three groups according to their antioxidant activity levels. Overall, clear differences in antioxidant activity between species were quantitatively demonstrated.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by a research grant from Kongju National University in 2023.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

Fig. 1
Loading plot (A) of antioxidant markers and score plot (B) of Korean brown seaweeds. ABTS, 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; HORAC, hydroxyl radical averting capacity; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity.
algae-2025-40-8-14f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Hierarchical cluster analysis dendrogram of 23 Korean brown seaweeds based on their total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities.
algae-2025-40-8-14f2.jpg
Table 1
Total phenolic content and total flavonoid content of Korean brown seaweeds
Seaweed JBRI No. Total phenolic content (mg GAE g1 dw) Total flavonoid content (mg CE g1 dw)
Agarum cribrosum 20086 16.48 ± 0.20h 4.15 ± 0.14i
Colpomenia bullosa (Saunders) Yamada in Yamada & Kinoshita 20383 13.05 ± 0.36i 4.62 ± 0.14hi
Costaria costata (C. Agardh) Saunders 20020 2.08 ± 0.05o 2.17 ± 0.00lm
Desmarestia tabacoides Okamura 20087 6.46 ± 0.27m 4.78 ± 0.00gh
Dictyoperis dichotoma (Hudson) Lamouroux 20096 4.61 ± 0.20n 2.64 ± 0.00kl
Dictyota okamurae (Dawson) Hötning, Schnetter, et Prud’homme van Reine 20435 8.46 ± 0.12jk 7.87 ± 0.24e
Distromium decumbens 20161 53.71 ± 1.85c 8.58 ± 0.41d
Eisenia bicyclis (Kjellman) Setchell 20022 33.85 ± 0.12e 6.32 ± 0.17f
Ishige sinicola (Setchell et Gardner) Chihara 20388 46.40 ± 0.90d 7.71 ± 0.14e
Myagropsis myagroides (Martens ex Turner) Fensholt 20370 6.67 ± 0.16lm 2.48 ± 0.14klm
Pachydictyon coriaceum (Holmes) Okamura 20110 4.88 ± 0.08n 3.71 ± 0.17i
Padina crassa Yamada 20016 6.67 ± 0.12lm 3.12 ± 0.00jk
Padina gymnospora (Kützing) Sonder 20384 65.89 ± 1.14a 13.89 ± 0.27b
Sarassum nigrifolium Yendo 20050 9.33 ± 0.25j 4.15 ± 0.14i
Sargassum coreanum J. Agardh 20337 7.83 ± 0.05kl 3.35 ± 0.00j
Sargassum filicinum Harvey 20353 56.74 ± 1.65b 14.92 ± 0.36a
Sargassum giganteifolium Yamada 20028 15.56 ± 0.16h 5.57 ± 0.14g
Sargassum hemiphyllum (Turner) C. Agardh 20341 52.73 ± 0.71c 13.65 ± 0.14b
Sargassum pinnatifidum Harvey 20380 15.66 ± 0.09h 4.38 ± 0.14i
Sargassum serratifolium (C. Agardh) C. Agardh 20401 18.61 ± 0.81g 5.33 ± 0.14g
Sargassum siliquastrum (Mertens ex Turner) C. Agardh 20371 30.77 ± 1.00f 10.24 ± 0.24c
Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar 20051 1.69 ± 0.05o 1.93 ± 0.00m
Undarria crenata Y. Lee & Yoon 20068 2.50 ± 0.00o 1.85 ± 0.14m

JBRI No., catalogue No. in Jeju Biodiversity Research Institute; mg GAE g−1 dw, mg gallic acid equivalent g−1 dry weight; mg CE g−1 dw, mg catechin equivalent g−1 dry weight.

Different alphabet letters in each column indicate significant difference among nut types at p < 0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test.

Table 2
Antioxidant activity of Korean brown seaweeds
Seaweed DPPH radical scavenging activity (% control) ABTS radical scavenging activity (% control) Reducing power (A700) ORAC (mg TE g1 dw) HORAC (mg GAE g1 dw)
Agarum cribrosum 73.79 ± 1.17g 84.26 ± 0.33e 0.003 ± 0.004fghi 230.43 ± 7.31fg 78.17 ± 3.61de
Colpomenia bullosa (Saunders) Yamada in Yamada & Kinoshita 89.35 ± 3.15bcd 79.40 ± 0.56f 0.003 ± 0.000ghi 169.44 ± 4.69hi 86.51 ± 8.21bcd
Costaria costata (C. Agardh) Saunders 91.52 ± 0.53bc 98.06 ± 1.34b 0.019 ± 0.0006b 16.02 ± 9.78m 58.04 ± 5.91fg
Desmarestia tabacoides Okamura 86.53 ± 3.82cde 87.78 ± 1.40d 0.006 ± 0.001efg 38.25 ± 11.72m 44.37 ± 4.00h
Dictyoperis dichotoma (Hudson) Lamouroux 94.69 ± 0.75b 76.14 ± 1.04g 0.003 ± 0.0000hi 92.51 ± 5.65k 69.17 ± 7.56ef
Dictyota okamurae (Dawson) Hötning, Schnetter, et Prud’homme van Reine 88.79 ± 1.34bcd 97.25 ± 0.96b 0.000 ± 0.0000j 73.92 ± 4.07kl 65.88 ± 9.53f
Distromium decumbens 47.34 ± 0.55hij 23.46 ± 0.65k 0.006 ± 0.0000e 381.34 ± 8.77a 83.69 ± 4.14cd
Eisenia bicyclis (Kjellman) Setchell 34.26 ± 1.12kl 42.09 ± 1.22i 0.030 ± 0.0000a 347.23 ± 20.07cd 96.52 ± 6.60ab
Ishige sinicola (Setchell et Gardner) Chihara 54.04 ± 3.23h 29.92 ± 2.47j 0.004 ± 0.000fghi 269.60 ± 8.01e 48.95 ± 2.95gh
Myagropsis myagroides (Martens ex Turner) Fensholt 89.41 ± 3.26bcd 82.33 ± 1.41e 0.000 ± 0.0000j 94.27 ± 21.95k 59.50 ± 3.77fg
Pachydictyon coriaceum (Holmes) Okamura 94.58 ± 2.35b 92.85 ± 0.49c 0.004 ± 0.0000fgh 77.12 ± 3.68kl 64.10 ± 4.37f
Padina crassa Yamada 81.18 ± 0.70ef 91.50 ± 0.34c 0.014 ± 0.0006c 163.10 ± 19.55i 63.26 ± 3.43f
Padina gymnospora (Kützing) Sonder 37.36 ± 1.09ij 9.63 ± 0.64m 0.004 ± 0.0000fgh 371.15 ± 5.52ab 102.29 ± 7.12a
Sarassum nigrifolium Yendo 79.21 ± 3.93fg 82.50 ± 1.40e 0.003 ± 0.0007hi 128.80 ± 10.02j 60.49 ± 8.62f
Sargassum coreanum J. Agardh 83.09 ± 2.16def 90.25 ± 0.61cd 0.006 ± 0.0000ef 73.37 ±14.42kl 41.27 ± 3.73h
Sargassum filicinum Harvey 30.94 ± 2.36l 13.20 ± 0.54l 0.005 ± 0.0000ef 357.26 ± 7.52bc 94.64 ± 8.80abc
Sargassum giganteifolium Yamada 53.56 ± 2.40hi 79.23 ± 1.79f 0.011 ± 0.0007d 186.15 ± 23.37h 46.81 ± 5.94h
Sargassum hemiphyllum (Turner) C. Agardh 19.06 ± 0.62m 30.08 ± 1.19j 0.007 ± 0.0007e 331.84 ± 5.53d 79.35 ± 4.21de
Sargassum pinnatifidum Harvey 80.23 ± 1.78efg 76.21 ± 0.56g 0.000 ± 0.0007j 239.04 ± 8.94f 82.33 ± 5.14d
Sargassum serratifolium (C. Agardh) C. Agardh 40.56 ± 2.19jk 55.79 ± 2.89h 0.002 ± 0.0000hi 215.77 ± 10.26g 64.18 ± 1.89f
Sargassum siliquastrum (Mertens ex Turner) C. Agardh 24.09 ± 2.18m 57.45 ± 1.22h 0.002 ± 0.0000ij 357.26 ± 7.52bc 94.64 ± 8.80abc
Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar 101.90 ± 3.97a 118.65 ± 0.71a 0.000 ± 0.0000j 31.12 ± 14.30mn 61.41 ± 4.28f
Undaria crenata Y. Lee & Yoon 102.06 ± 2.48a 120.18 ± 0.24a 0.003 ± 0.0000ghi 67.95 ± 9.15l 68.64 ± 10.19ef

DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (2,2’-azino-bis[3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid]) radical scavenging activity, and reducing power were measured using 300 μg dw mL−1 of extract. ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; TE, Trolox equivalents; dw, dry weight; HORAC, hydroxyl radical averting capacity; GAE, gallic acid equivalents.

Different alphabet letters in each column indicate significant difference among nut types at p < 0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test.

Table 3
Correlation coefficient between TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activities of Korean brown seaweeds
TPC TFC DPPH ABTS RP ORAC HORAC
TPC 1 0.903** 0.822** 0.948** 0.085 0.900** 0.602**
TFC 1 0.811** 0.824** −0.026 0.792** 0.591**
DPPH 1 0.811** 0.246 0.885** 0.506*
ABTS 1 0.211 0.843** 0.570**
RP 1 0.152 0.088
ORAC 1 0.732**
HORAC 1

TPC, total phenolic contents; TFC, total flavonoid contents; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); RP, reducing power; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; HORAC, hydroxyl radical averting capacity.

* p < 0.05,

** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).

REFERENCES

Amin, I., Norazaidah, Y. & Hainida, K. I. E. 2006. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of raw and blanched Amaranthus species. Food Chem. 94:47–52. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.048
crossref
Cíž, M, Cížová, H., Denev, P., Kratchanova, M., Slavov, A. & Lojek, A. 2010. Different methods for control and comparison of the antioxidant properties of vegetables. Food Control. 21:518–523. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.07.017
crossref
Gramza, A., Pawlak-Lemańska, K., Korczak, J., Wąsowicz, E. & Rudzinsk, M. 2005. Tea extracts as free radical scavengers. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 14:861–867.

Gülçin, İ 2012. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: an overview. Arch. Toxicol. 86:345–391. doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0774-2
crossref pmid pdf
Hamid, S. S., Wakayama, M., Ichihara, K., et al. 2019. Metabolome profiling of various seaweed species discriminates between brown, red, and green algae. Planta. 249:1921–1947. doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03134-1
crossref pmid pdf
Huang, D., Ou, B., Hampsch-Woodill, M., Flanagan, J. A. & Deemer, E. K. 2002. Development and validation of oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay for lipophilic antioxidants using randomly methylated beta-cyclodextrin as the solubility enhancer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:1815–1821. doi.org/10.1021/jf0113732
crossref pmid
Huang, D., Ou, B. & Prior, R. L. 2005. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:1841–1856. doi.org/10.1021/jf030723c
crossref pmid
Jiménez-Escrig, A., Gómez-Ordóñez, E. & Rupérez, P. 2012. Brown and red seaweeds as potential sources of antioxidant nutraceuticals. J. Appl. Phycol. 24:1123–1132. doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9742-8
crossref pdf
Jomova, K., Raptova, R., Alomar, S. Y., et al. 2023. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: chronic diseases and aging. Arch. Toxicol. 97:2499–2574. doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03562-9
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Kang, N., Heo, S. Y., Kim, E. A., Cha, S. H., Ryu, B. & Heo, S. J. 2023. Antiviral effect of fucoxanthin obtained from Sargassum siliquastrum (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Algae. 38:295–306. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.11.29
crossref pdf
Ko, K., Kang, M., Kim, E., Cui, J., Zhang, G. & Lee, Y. 2023. Brown seaweed-derived polysaccharides: comparison of the extraction methods by determining the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 52:547–555. doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2023.52.6.547
crossref
Lee, J.-H., Jeong, C. S. & Kim, G.-H. 2009. Antioxidant and suppressive effects of ethanolic extract fractions from safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) flower on the biosynthesis of inflammatory mediators from LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 18:143–149.

Lee, J. I. & Lee, J.-H. 2014. Antioxidant and inhibitory activities of thioflavanones against nitric oxide production. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 23:957–963. doi.org/10.1007/s10068-014-0129-x
crossref pdf
Oh, P.-S., Lee, S.-J. & Lim, K.-T. 2004. Antioxidative activity of 90 kDa glycoprotein isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica var. saboten Makino. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13:781–789.

Ou, B., Huang, D., Hampsch-Woodill, M., Flanagan, J. A. & Deemer, E. K. 2002. Analysis of antioxidant activities of common vegetables employing oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (HORAC) assays: a comparative study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:3122–3128. doi.org/10.1021/jf0116606
crossref pmid
Prior, R. L., Wu, X. & Schaich, K. 2005. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:4290–4302. doi.org/10.1021/jf0502698
crossref pmid
Thaipong, K., Boonprakob, U., Crosby, K., Cisneros-Zevallos, L. & Byrne, D. H. 2006. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 19:669–675. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.01.003
crossref
Wong, S. P., Leong, L. P. & Koh, J. H. W. 2006. Antioxidant activities of aqueous extracts of selected plants. Food Chem. 99:775–783. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.058
crossref
Yuan, Y. V. & Walsh, N. A. 2006. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of extracts from a variety of edible seaweeds. Food Chem. Toxicol. 44:1144–1150. doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.02.002
crossref pmid
Zhishen, J., Mengcheng, T. & Jianming, W. 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 64:555–559. doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2
crossref
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
500
View
39
Download
Related article
Editorial Office
[14348] A-1716, Gwangmyeong Trade Center, 72 Iljik-ro Gwangmyeong-si. Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Tel: +82-2-899-5980  Fax: +82-2-899-5922    E-mail: editalgae@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Phycology.                 Developed in M2PI