Stress-induced secondary carotenogenesis in Coelastrella rubescens (Scenedesmaceae, Chlorophyta), a producer of value-added keto-carotenoids

Article information

Algae. 2017;32(3):245-259
Publication date (electronic) : 2017 September 15
doi : https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2017.32.8.6
1The A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Marine Biological Research, Sevastopol 299011, Crimea
2Biological Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
3National Research Nuclear University MEPhi, Centre for Humanities Research and Technology, Moscow 115409, Russia
*Corresponding Author: E-mail: solovchenko@mail.bio.msu.ru, Tel: +007-495-939-25-87, Fax: +007-495-939-38-07
Received 2017 February 01; Accepted 2017 August 06.

Abstract

We report on the culture growth and stress-induced secondary carotenogenesis in a biotechnologically promising but largely unexplored chlorophyte Coelastrella rubescens strain Vinatzer/Innsbruck V 195. Changes in the cell morphometry, biomass accumulation, its carotenoid and fatty acid profiles were followed in the cultures supplemented with either inorganic (CO2) or organic (sodium acetate) carbon on the background of low-pH stress. Collectively, the results of the study characterize C. rubescens as a biotechnologically promising, potentially double-purpose organism. It produces several secondary keto-carotenoids with a considerable proportion of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin. At the same time, the cell lipid fatty acid profile of this microalga is suitable for obtaining a high-quality biodiesel complying with the strictest EN14214 European standard.

INTRODUCTION

Recent decades were marked by explosive growth of interest to carotenogenic microalgae as an important source of value-added natural carotenoids (Car)-a much sought-after nutraceuticals, cosmetics and medicine components with a plethora of beneficial effects on health (Lorenz and Cysewski 2000, Leu and Boussiba 2014, Solovchenko and Chekanov 2014). Despite rapid expansion of knowledge of the biology of and growing number of reports on these microalgae as novel sources of Car (Boussiba 2000, Lorenz and Cysewski 2000, Leu and Boussiba 2014), the number of industrially grown carotenogenic microalgae remains essentially unchanged for a long time including the chlorophytes Haematococcus pluvialis (Han et al. 2013) and Dunaliella salina (Borowitzka 2013). A common reason for this is a lack of in-depth knowledge and hence the absence of a universal screening strategy for new carotenogenic microalgae, a group constituted by the organisms vastly different in terms of their taxonomy, biology, and ecology. This diversity complicates screening for promising producer strains suitable for development of economically viable technologies of Car-enriched biomass generation. Another reason is the tough competition of the natural Car from microalgae with their synthetic counterparts which almost drove out of market natural Car-based feed additives (Lorenz and Cysewski 2000).

Organisms capable of producing a broader line of marketable bioproducts such as value-added keto-carotenoids (e.g., astaxanthin and cantaxanthin) and neutral lipids convertible to biofuel might have an advantage allowing to develop more diversified biotechnologies using the biorefinery approach (Lam and Lee 2011, Borowitzka and Moheimani 2013, Subramanian et al. 2013). In this context, a chlorophyte Coelastrella (Scotiellopsis) rubescens Kaufnerová et Eliáš 2013 (Sphaeropleales, Scenedesmaceae) can be considered as a promising organism with several traits beneficial from the standpoint of mass cultivation. Coelastrella rubescens combines the capability of co-accumulation of secondary Car (up to 2% DW) and lipids (up to 50% DW) with high tolerance to diverse stresses (Chubchikova et al. 2009, Minyuk et al. 2010, 2016). Still, the literature available to us contains scarce reports on suitability of C. rubescens for biotechnological production of value-added Car and/or lipid precursors of biodiesel. Recently, we characterized the growth and nutrient uptake kinetics of green (vegetative) cells of C. rubescens IPPAS H-350 under pH-stat conditions maintained by controlled direct injection of CO2 into the culture (Minyuk et al. 2016), but the stress-induced carotenogenesis, the process essential for industrial scale production of the valuable Car pigments, remained so far unelucidated in this organism.

This work aimed at characterization of secondary carotenogenesis and fatty acid (FA) profile C. rubescens under two-stage batch cultivation condition. Instead of focusing on individual stress effect, we applied a combination stressor including raising the irradiance and deprivation of nutrients by dilution of the culture. We followed the changes in cell morphometry and culture productivity. In addition, we tested a novel approach to enhancement of the secondary ketocarotenoid biosynthesis by acidification of the medium to pH 5 by direct CO2 injection and/or addition of organic carbon source sodium acetate, NaAc (to the final level of 25 mmol).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strain and its molecular identification

A strain of Coelastrella (Vinatzer) Scotiellopsis rubescens Kaufnerová et Eliáš (Scenedesmaceae, Sphaeropleales, Chlorophyceae) obtained from the collection of microalgae of the Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences in 2006 as Scotiellopsis rubescens Vinatzer strain IPPAS H-350 (Vinatzer/Innsbruck V 195 = CCALA 475) (Kaufnerová and Eliáš 2013).

For the genomic DNA isolation, microalgal biomass sample (2–5 mg DW) was collected and subjected to three cycles of liquid nitrogen freezing-thawing to destroy the though cell walls. DNA was extracted using MagJET Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Thermo Scientific, Billerica, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quality of the DNA was evaluated by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.2 μg mL−1).

The DNA sequences encoding 18S rRNA from nuclear ribosomal gene cluster (18SrRNA) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described in Buchheim et al. (2013) using following primers: internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 2, gctgcgttcttcatcgatgc; NS1, gtagtcatatgcttgtctc. PCR product was purified with Cleanup Standard (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) reagents according to manufactures protocol and sequenced with using BigDye Terminator v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) reagents on 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) automated sequencer.

During the analysis of the obtained DNA sequences homologous sequences were searched against NCBI GeneBank (nucleotide collection nr/nt database) using BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) software (Altschul et al. 1990). The sequences were further analyzed with MEGA 6.06 software (Tamura et al. 2013). Multiple alignment was performed using 10 iterations of the MUSCLE algorithm (Edgar 2004) with other parameters set to default values.

Phylogenetic trees were constructed with using maximum likelihood and neighbor-joining algorithms (Saitou and Nei 1987) with K2 model of evolutionary distance calculation and other parameters set to default values in MEGA 6.06. The accuracy of the tree topology was tested using bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein 1985) with 1,000 replicates.

Cultivation conditions

The stock culture was maintained in the solidified (1.5% agar) BBM medium (Bishoff and Bold 1963) at 15–16°C and 25 μmol quanta m−2 s−1. In subsequent experiments, we employed two-stage cultivation as a proven approach for study of carotenogenic microalgae (Boussiba 2000, Fábregas et al. 2001, Chubchikova et al. 2010).

At the first (“green”) stage the microalga was batch-cultivated for 11 days in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks in the modified BBM medium containing NaNO3 1,310 mg L−1, MgSO4·7H2O 75 mg L−1, NaCl 25 mg L−1, K2HPO4·3H2O 42 mg L−1, KH2PO4 99 mg L−1, EDTA-Na2 50 mg L−1, KOH 31 mg L−1, H3BO3 11 mg L−1, ZnSO4·7H2O 8.82 mg L−1, MnCl2·4H2O 1.44 mg L−1, Na2MoO4·2H2O 2.42 mg L−1, CuSO4·5H2O 1.57 mg L−1, Co(NO3)2·6H2O 0.49 mg L−1, FeSO4·7H2O 4.98 mg L−1, CaCl2 18.9 mg L−1 + 1 μL of concentrated H2SO4 at 25 ± 1°C and a unilateral side illumination with daylight fluorescent lamps “Feron” DL 20W 6400K (Russia), 140 μmol PAR quanta m−2 s−1 (as measured at the flask surface), 15 h light : 9 h dark. The culture was continuously sparged with air at a rate of 1 vvm using a compressor Resun ACO-9630 (Resun, China). During the light period, the pH was maintained at a constant level (7.0 ± 0.05) by means of direct supply of CO2 from a gas cylinder controlled by solenoid valves Camozzi A7E (Camozzi, Brescia, Italy) and a digital pH controller Aqua Medic pH 2001C (Aqua Medic GmbH, Bissendorf, Germany). A culture started at a pH 7.0 and sparged with atmospheric air only served as the control. The initial cell density and volume of the cultures were 1.0 × 106 ± 0.16 × 105 cells mL−1 and 0.45 L, respectively.

To induce carotenogenesis (the second, “red” stage of cultivation), the cells were pelleted by centrifugation (770 g, 2 min) on an Eppendorf 5810 centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and re-suspended in 0.45 L of the modified BBM medium with 10-fold reduced N and P content (4.12 mg L−1 NO3-N; 5.32 mg L−1 PO4-P). The starting cell density was, as a result, 2 × 106 cells mL−1, i.e., 11-fold lower in comparison with the cell density attained by the end of the “green” stage. At the “red” stage, the cultures were illuminated from both sides (the total PAR irradiance of 240 μmol PAR quanta m−2 s−1). Considering the reduced cell density at the “red” stage, the effective irradiance at this stage is estimated to be 20-fold higher than that employed at the “green” stage constituting the stress necessary for the induction of secondary carotenogenesis.

To provide an additional stress inducing the biosynthesis of the secondary Car, we lowered the pH of the culture to 5.0 (Zhang et al. 1997) adjusting the CO2 inflow (this variant was designated as ‘CO2’) or supplemented the culture with sodium acetate, CH3COONa·3H2O (Kobayashi et al. 1993), the latter treatment was designated as ‘NaAc.’ Sodium acetate was supplemented at 2, 4, and 6th day of cultivation as 2 M solution to a final concentration of 25 mmol L−1. A culture receiving no additional carbon source served as the control in these experiments.

Monitoring of the culture growth and cell size

The number (n) and volume (V) of the cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer (Hyka et al. 2013) FC 500 CytomicsTM λ 488 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Cell n was evaluated on the log-scaled two-parameter cytograms of forward scattering. Linear cell size was measured on micrographs captured with a photomicroscope Leica DM-1000 (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Cell volumes were calculated using equation for elongated spheroid volume basing on 100 sampled cells.

Dry weight was determined gravimetrically on nitrocellulose membrane filters Sartorius SM 11301 N (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) with a pore size of 3 μm (Vonshak 1985).

Average yield (PAVG) and specific growth rate (μAVG) were calculated for the period of 0–10 days on the cell number and DW basis (Wood et al. 2005) as

PAVG=(N1-N0)/(t1-t0);P1=(DW1-DW0)/(t1-t0);μAVG=ln (N1/N0)/(t1-t0);μ1=ln (DW1/DW0)/(t1-t0),

where PAVG is the average productivity on cell number basis, cell mL−1 d−1; N0, the initial cell density, cell mL−1; N1, cell density after 10 d of cultivation, cell mL−1; (t1 − t0), the duration of cultivation, d; P1, the average productivity on DW basis, mg L−1 d−1; DW0, initial DW, mg L−1; DW1, the final DW, mg L−1; μAVG, mean specific growth rate on cell number basis, d−1; μ1, mean specific growth rate on DW basis, d−1.

Doubling time was calculated as Td = ln(2) (μ−1), where μ is a mean specific growth rate on cell number basis (Wood et al. 2005).

Pigment assay

Pigments were extracted with dimethyl sulfoxide (Pal et al. 2011) or acetone (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC] grade; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using the same extraction procedure. Content of chlorophyll (Chl) a and b and total Car in the extracts was determined with a spectrophotometer Agilent Cary 300 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (Lichtenthaler 1987, Solovchenko et al. 2010). The Car profile was resolved by HPLC as described previously (Chekanov et al. 2014).

Cell composition analysis

Lipids were extracted using the method of Bligh and Dyer (1959). Total cell lipid content was determined by a colorimetric sulfo-phospho-vanilin method (Ahlgren and Merino 1991) via a calibration curve constructed with food grade olive oil (ABEA, Chania, Greece) purified on a Al2O3 column. Average culture lipid productivity at the “red” stage was calculated as PL = (L1 − L0)/(t1 − t0), where L1 and L0 are total lipid contents at the beginning (t0) and at the end (t1) of the “red” stage.

FA composition of the cell lipids was determined by gas chromatography mass spectrometry of the FA methyl esters obtained by direct transesterification of cells (Chekanov et al. 2014). The FA profile data were used for prediction of the properties of the biodiesel (Islam et al. 2013) potentially obtained from the C. rubescens biomass with the corresponding FA profile.

Total protein was assayed using the Lowry method (Lowry et al. 1951), carbohydrates were assayed using a phenol-sulfur reagent (DuBois et al. 1956).

Assay of nutrients in the medium

The concentration of NO3 in the medium was monitored using a nitrate-selective electrode 9307BNWP (Thermo Orion, Beverly, MA, USA), concentration of PO43−—by the Murphy-Riley colorimetric method (Murphy and Riley 1962).

All experiments were carried out in three biological replications with three analytical replications for each. Mean values and their standard deviations are shown in the figures, unless stated otherwise. The significance of the difference between the averages was tested using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Confirmation of the taxonomy status of the studied strain

In the beginning of the work it was essential to confirm the taxonomical status of the studied microalgal strain using a molecular identification-based approach due to recent revisions in this taxonomy domain (Punčochářová and Kalina 1981, Kaufnerová and Eliáš 2013). Towards this end, the fragment of genomic DNA encoding 18S rRNA (predicted length 2,200 bp) was isolated and sequenced (GenBank ID KT962984). The homology search using BLAST showed the maximal (95–99%) identity of the obtained sequence with 18SrRNA gene of microalgae from the family Scenesesmaceae as can be seen from the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). The strain IPPAS H-350 clustered with microalgae from family Scenedesmaceae (such as Coelastrum, Scenedesmus, Acutodesmus) forming a sub-group with microalgae S. terrestris CCAP-279-1, C. striolata CAUP H 3602, Coelastrella sp. KGU-HN001. The BLAST search revealed the highest similarity of the 18SrRNA sequences among the genera Scotiellopsis Vinatzer and Coelastrella Chodat so the used locus did not provide enough selectivity to discern reliably the genera Scotiellopsis and Coelastrella based solely on 18SrRNA sequence data.

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree for selected microalgae from the order Sphaeropleales constructed by maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor joining (NJ) algorithm based on K2 model of nucleotide substitution (+G, parameter = 0.70; [+I], 60% sites). The tree with the highest log likelihood (−2,631.5234) is shown. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. ML/NJ bootstrap values >50 are shown near the branches.

At the same time, Scotiellopsis clearly differs from Coelastrella by the presence of polar thickenings (Punčochářová and Kalina 1981, Kaufnerová and Eliáš 2013) although Hanagata (1998) proposed joining these two genera with the genus Scenedesmus on the grounds of high similarity of their 18SrRNA sequence. Subsequent analysis of compensatory base changes in the ITS II of the nuclear ribosomal gene cluster and 18SrRNA carried out by Kaufnerová and Eliáš (2013) revealed the paraphyletic nature of the genus Scotiellopsis. As a result, the type species S. rubescens was transferred to genus Coelastrella with name C. rubescens. Accordingly, the currently most correct name of the studied strain IPPAS H-350 is likely C. rubescens and Scotiellopsis rubescens and Scenedesmus rubescens are its basyonims. At the same time, the systematic of the chlorophytes within the order Sphaeropleales is still far from established and further changes might be expected.

Specifics of the two-stage cultivation of Coelastrella rubescens

Changes in the cell morphology and physiology at the “green” stage

The two-stage batch culture is a proven approach for screening and characterization of carotenogenic microalgae. This method provides a large body of diverse valuable information about the algal growth and metabolism from a single experiment. In this approach, the Car productivity of the culture is constituted by the two key component: cell division rate under optimal conditions at the “green” stage and survival of the cells and Car biosynthesis rate under the stress at the “red” stage. Notably, a severe combination stress (e.g., elevated irradiance and essential nutrient deprivation) is often applied at the “red” stage (Boussiba 2000, Fábregas et al. 2001, Minyuk et al. 2010). In this work, we achieved these conditions by diluting the “green”-stage pre-cultures.

As was earlier shown for Haematococcus pluvialis (Wang et al. 2014), physiological condition and growth phase during the stress-induction of secondary carotenogenesis are crucial for the cell survival and hence for the productivity at the “red” stage. In physiologically homogenous “green” cultures dominated by monad cells devoid of secondary Car, the stress could lead to a mortality rate as high as 40–60%. In more heterogeneous cultures including, apart from the monad cells, a sizeable proportion of immotile palmelloid cells which possess Car/Chl mass ratio above 0.35 and hence feature a higher stress tolerance, the mortality dropped drastically to 4% (Minyuk 2008). In this work, we tested if the same pattern applies to C. rubescens. We subjected pre-stationary cultures of this microalga to the stress with simultaneous recording of their functional condition (growth rate, cell morphology and nutrient uptake).

Combination of cell suspension dilution, nutrient limitation and increase of the incident irradiance (for more detail, see Materials and Methods) reliably induced secondary carotenogenesis in the carotenogenic microalgae (Minyuk et al. 2010, 2016, Chelebieva et al. 2013, Han et al. 2013). Here, we tried to boost carotenogenesis by supplying extra carbon sources. This treatment is expected, on one hand, to increase the carbon flow into the Car biosynthesis pathway and, on the other hand, to exacerbate the stress contributing to the excess of fixed carbon on the background of limited sink capacity of the cell metabolism at the “red” stage (Lemoine and Schoefs 2010, Recht et al. 2014, Solovchenko 2015). To increase the stress intensity, the carbon oversupplementation in form of NaAc addition (Kobayashi et al. 1993) or CO2 addition was combined with acidification of the culture medium to a level considerably below the optimum for green algae via CO2 injection (Zhang et al. 1997). Thus, the exposure to elevated CO2 levels enhanced accumulation of astaxanthin in Chlorococcum sp. (Zang et al. 1997), Chlorella zofingiensis (Kessler and Czygan 1965) and Chlorococcum wimmeri (Brown et al. 1967), likely due to disturbance of the cell pH homeostasis (Solovchenko and Khozin-Goldberg 2013, Liu et al. 2016). In another experimental treatment, additional source of organic carbon was used (NaAc). In the lower concentration range (<10 mmol) NaAc is readily consumed by chlorophyte species capable of mixotrophic growth (Haematococcus pluvialis, Micractinium pusillum, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella sp., etc.). Although supplementation of cultures with NaAc facilitates the growth under insufficient light energy conditions, higher concentration of NaAc impair growth in dose-dependent manner (Heifetz et al. 2000, Bouarab et al. 2004, Minyuk 2008, Ji et al. 2013). In astaxanthin-producing species NaAc concentrations in the range 45–100 mmol exacerbate the low-nutrient and high-light stresses considerably promoting thereby the accumulation of the secondary carotenoids (Kobayashi et al. 1993, Sarada et al. 2002, Minyuk 2008, Yu et al. 2015), likely via an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation mediated by inhibition of catalase, a key antioxidant enzyme (Beers and Sizer 1956, Özben 2013).

As was shown earlier, supplementation of the culture with 50 mmol NaAc during the transition from the “green” to the “red” stage enhances the secondary Car content in the cells more than two-fold. However, there was no measurable increase in the Car productivity due to a considerable increased in the cell mortality (Chubchikova et al. 2010). Therefore, to avoid the excessive the cell mortality, we supplemented NaAc thrice with 2-d intervals, half of concentration normally used in previous our experiments with C. rubescens (0.25 mmol).

Changes in the cell morphology and physiology at the “green” stage

The kinetics of growth of and nutrient uptake by the batch culture of C. rubescens in the “green” stage are shown in Fig. 2A, see also Supplementary Fig. S1. Under our experimental conditions, the maximum and average specific growth rates were 0.95 ± 0.09 and 0.32 ± 0.002 d−1, respectively; the average doubling time—2.33 ± 0.03 d−1, and the average DW-based productivity—112.68 ± 6.72 mg L−1 d−1. By the end of the “green” stage, the growth rate of the culture slowed down. The culture represented a homogenous suspension of individual cells lacking the cell aggregates typically formed by this species under adverse conditions (Chubchikova et al. 2010).

Fig. 2

Changes in the cell number and biogenic element contents in the Coelastrella rubescens culture at the “green” cultivation stage (A) and size distribution of the cell population at the 11th day of cultivation (B).

The cells took up NO3 and PO43− from the medium in a molar ratio of 15.4 at an average rate 64.86 ± 6.77 and 9.35 ± 0.71 pg per 10,000 newly formed cells, respectively. The residual nutrient content in the medium was, by the end of the “green” stage, 25.03 ± 3.92 mg L−1 NO3 and 2.96 ± 0.97 mg L−1 PO43− (12.5% and 10.5% of the initial content, respectively). The cell size distribution of the culture was governed by young cells (V ≤ 60 μm3; 85% of total cell number including 20% of the small, newly released autospores, V = 10–20 μm 3). The older cells (V > 120 μm 3) were below 2% (Fig. 2B).

Culture growth and cell morphology as a function of cultivation conditions at the “red” stage

A characteristic response of C. rubescens to abrupt stress triggering the accumulation of secondary Car brought about a short transient increase of cell division rate regardless of the nature of the stress (Fig. 3A). After one day of stress, the cell number increased by 43% in the air-sparged control and by 55–56% in the cultures supplemented with CO2. A similar response to the same stress was observed in Ettlia carotinosa Komárek 1989 (Volvocales), although the cell division in E. carotinosa did not stop almost to the end of the “red” stage resulting in a considerable (7.4-fold) decline in the cell volume (Chelebieva et al. 2013). In the present work, the cell division stopped already at the second day, so the cell density of the carbon-supplemented cultures declined considerably to the end of the “red” stage. Remarkably, the mild NaAc stress did not increase the cell survival in this experimental variant. On the contrary, the cell mortality was the highest in this case and like that normally occurring after a single addition of NaAc to the concentration of 50 mmol (Chubchikova et al. 2009). It is likely that in the young Coelastrella cells exposure to 25 mmol NaAc at the second day of cultivation resulted in an increase in the ROS level (Kobayashi et al. 1993, Yu et al. 2015) hence the cessation of cell division; repeated addition of NaAc lead to a decline in the culture density. A similar effect might take place in the CO2 over-supplemented cultures. Thus, in Thalassiosira weissflogii cells an abrupt decline in pH triggered a dramatic increase in malonic dialdehyde, the product of lipid peroxidation and a marker of oxidative stress (Liu et al. 2016). Still we did not observe the mass death of young cells such as took place in H. pluvialis cultures under the same conditions resulting in the loss of a large part of the cells accumulated at the “green” stage. In all variants studied, the cell density of the C. rubescens cultures increased by 30–50% by the end of the experiment.

Fig. 3

The changes in number (A) and average size (B) of the Coelastrella rubescens cells at the “red” stage and cell size distribution (C–E) in the culture at the eighth day with air sparging (curve 1) (C), CO2 injection (curve 2) (D), or NaAc supplementation (curve 3) (E).

The cessation of cell division was accompanied by the characteristic changes in cell size distribution constituted by the 2.5- to 4.0-fold increase in the average volume of autospores by the end of the “red” stage (Fig. 3B–E). These changes were most pronounced in the cultures supplemented with CO2 (pH 5) where the proportion of large (V > 120 mkm3) senescing cells increased from 2 to 65% whereas the control (pH 7.9–9.2) and the NaAc-supplemented cultures (pH 7.9–8.9) features 1.5- to 2-time lower proportion of these cells (Fig. 3C–E).

At the same time, the cells of the CO2-supplemented and control cultures changed their cell shape from elliptic (L/D = 1.05–1.8) to spherical suggesting that the cells are nearing the resting state (Andreyeva 1998). In these cultures, the spherical cells amounted, at the eighth day, 42% and 33%, respectively. The NaAc supplementation did not affect the cell form distribution in the cultures.

Pigment content and composition of Coelastrella rubescens cells at different cultivation stages

The most characteristic and spectacular stress responses in carotenogenic microalgae are constituted by the drastic change of their pigment profile (Boussiba 2000, Lemoine and Schoefs 2010, Shah et al. 2016). This type of a response was documented in the stressed C. rubescens cells (Fig. 4). Taking into account that a considerable increase of average cell volume by the end of the “red” stage took place in all experimental variants, but to a significantly different extent, we normalized pigment content to the cell volume. Content of Chl a and b expressed per μm3 of cell volume declined during 8 days by 14–31 (Fig. 4D) and 12–26 times (Fig. 4E), respectively. Remarkably, the largest extent of Chl decline was found in the control culture limited by the three main nutrients (N, P, inorganic C) whereas the highest retention of Chl was typical of the NaAc-supplemented culture. Noteworthy, the cell volume-based representation of the pigment content turned to be handy for the analysis of the data on the microalgal pigment composition. Thus, the cell density-based content of total Car attained by the end of the “red” stage (0.8–1.1 pg cell−1) did not differ significantly from the initial value (1.0 pg cell−1) regardless of the stress treatment. By contrast, the cell-volume based Car content (Fig. 4C) and their DW percentages (Fig. 4I) declined 3.0 to 3.7- and 2.1 to 6.1-fold, respectively, by the end of the “red” stage.

Fig. 4

Pigment content expressed per cell (A–C), cell volume (D–F) or as dry biomass percentage (G–I) of Coelastrella rubescens in the beginning (1) and in the end (2–4) of the “red” stage. 2, air-sparged control; 3, CO2-supplemented culture; 4, NaAc-supplemented culture; Car., carotenoids.

Unexpectedly, the NaAc-supplemented cultures displayed the lowest total Car percentages of DW and a lack of Car accumulation (−0.002 mg L−1 d−1 vs. 0.25 or 0.18 mg L−1 d−1 in the air-sparged control or the CO2-supplemented cultures, respectively).

The decline of Car productivity in the CO2-supplemented cultures was not apparent since the latter took a bright orange color whereas the NaAc-supplemented cultures remained brown. This change of the culture color was a visual manifestation of the two opposite-directed processes: degradation of the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and primary Car) and accumulation of secondary Car as evidenced by the characteristic changes of the C. rubescens cell extract absorbance spectra (not shown) and their Car profiles resolved by HPLC (Table 1, Fig. 5).

Carotenoid composition of Coelastrella rubescens stressed cells depending on cultivation mode (% total)

Fig. 5

Carotenoid composition of Coelastrella rubescens at the end of the “green” (A) and “red” stages after 7 d of air sparging (B–D) without or with supplementation (B) of CO2 (C) or NaAc (D). Peak designation: 1, neoxanthin; 2, violaxanthin; 3, anteraxanthin; 4, lutein + zeaxanthin; 5, 6, canthaxanthin; 7, 10, 12, 13, 16, astaxanthin monoesters; 8, 14, 15, 17, adonixanthin monoesters; 11, adonixanthin monoesters + echinenone; 18, 19, 21, astaxanthin diesters; 20, α- and β-carotene. See also Table 1.

The data on the secondary Car in stressed Coelastrella cells appeared to be surprisingly scarce in the literature available to us; for a remarkable exception (Hu et al. 2013). Therefore, we paid special attention to the composition of these pigments in studied microalga. A considerable decline in photosynthetic pigment (Chl a and b as well as lutein) took place along with the build-up of cantaxanthin and monoesters of ketocarotenoids (Fig. 5). Qualitatively, the composition of the secondary Car accumulated during the stress exposure resembled that in a H. pluvalis strain IPPAS H-2018 isolated from White Sea (Chekanov et al. 2014) excepting the presence of notable amounts of canthaxanthin and adonixanthin monoesters.

The presence of a large (30–60% of the total Car) amount of photosynthetic Car and astaxanthin precursors in the cells of the 8-day-old “red” stage culture suggested that formation of the secondary Car pool and hence the transition of the microalga to the resting stage was incomplete. Further optimization of stressing conditions (duration of the “red” stage, irradiance, chemical stimulation of secondary carotenogenesis) might turn to be necessary for acceleration of the aplanospore maturation and increase in the proportion of secondary ketocarotenoids in total Car. This finding can also indicate that C. rubescens belong to a peculiar group of chlorophytes (mainly edaphophylic and aerophylic) whose resting cells feature a complex composition of secondary Car dominated by astaxanthin together with its precursors (Liu and Lee 2000, Abe et al. 2007). Still, this species holds a promise for biotechnology due to its advantages such as high growth rate exceeding that of H. pluvialis and considerably higher environmental stress tolerance. According to our preliminary estimations, the upper limit of heat stress tolerance in the rapidly dividing “green” cells of C. rubescens is 33–35°C whereas the temperatures 40–42°C induce the transition to the “red” stage. Furthermore, this organism is suitable for outdoor cultivation in open systems since, at a sufficiently high cell density, its cultures are relatively resistant to algal contamination and protozoan grazing (not shown). Considering the 11-fold dilution of the culture during the transition to the “red” stage and the initial cell density of 1.1 × 106 cells mL−1 (0.17 ± 0.01 g L−1 DW), the net Car productivity was 2.75 ± 0.49 or 2.03 ± 0.19 mg L−1 d−1 in the air-sparged control or the CO2-supplemented cultures, respectively suggesting the feasibility of commercial production of carotenoids with C. rubescens under the studied conditions.

Proximate composition of the stressed Coelastrella rubescens cells

The nutrient-starving cells of C. rubescens vigorously accumulated DW (Fig. 6A–C): its content in the 11-fold diluted cultures increased 2.4- to 2.6-fold over 8 days of cultivation (Fig. 6A). This acclimatory response is common for all carotenogenic microalgae. Its magnitude depends on the nature and intensity of the stress as well as on the microalgal species (Boussiba 2000, Lemonie and Schoefs 2010, Juneja et al. 2013). In this case average DW productivity of C. rubescens did not differ in the air-sparged control and the CO2-supplemented cultures (77.8–77.9 mg L−1 d−1) whereas it was considerably lower in the NaAc-supplemented cultures (28.8 mg L−1 d−1) in accord with a lower final cell density (Fig. 3A) and per cell DW content (Figs 3B & 6B) of the “green” culture. At the same time, the NaAc-supplemented cultures possessed the highest DW content expressed per μm3 cell (2.20 ± 0.31 pg μm−3 vs. 1.53 ± 0.16 or 0.85 ± 0.20 pg μm−3 in the control or CO2-supplemented cultures, respectively (Fig. 6C).

Fig. 6

Dry weight content per liter of culture (A), cell (B), or μm3 cell volume (C) and its protein (D), lipid (E), and content (F) of the “green” (1) and “red” (2–4) cells sparged with air (2), supplemented with CO2 (3) or NaAc (4). DBC, dry biomass content.

Enhanced accumulation of dry weight in the presence of NaAc is likely due to the ease of its assimilation by chlorophyte cells which readily take up and assimilate NaAc via several metabolic pathways accepting acetyl-CoA (Wiessner 1979, Nelson and Cox 2013). Another possibility under illuminated conditions is oxidation of NaAc to CO2 with subsequent assimilation of the latter in the biosyntheses of carbohydrates and lipids (Singh et al. 2014).

We documented a sharp decline in protein percentage of DW (from 31.8 to 8.2–16.5%) (Fig. 6D) typical of the stressed of carotenogenic microalgae cells (Boussiba 2000). Particularly, decline in the protein content of the cell might be related with nitrogen shortage and re-allocation of this essential nutrient by means of stress-induced autophagy (Pérez-Pérez et al. 2012, Nelson and Cox 2013). The maximum decline in the protein percentage of DW (74% of the initial level) was recorded in the CO2-supplemented cultures. At the same time, the stressed cultures displayed the slow-down of cell division and accumulation of carbon-rich reserves, mainly lipids. Lipid DW percentage comprised 1.2- to 1.5-fold in all stressed cells (Fig. 6E), whereas a significant carbohydrate content took place only in the cultures supplemented with NaAc (by 20.4%) (Fig. 6F). The average lipid productivity in the air-sparged and CO2-supplemented cultures was two times higher than in NaAc-supplemented cultures (61.03 ± 4.08 and 67.37 ± 5.60 vs. 31.31 ± 1.97 mg L−1 d−1). Taking into account the initial cell density of 1 × 106 cell mL−1 and 11-fold dilution before the onset of the stress, the lipid productivity (and total lipid yield, PAVG over 19 d) constituted 292.95 ± 19.67 mg L−1 d−1 (5.57 g) in the air-sparged control and 314.85 ± 26.15 mg L−1 d−1 (5.98 g) in the CO2-supplemented culture whereas in the NaAc-supplemented culture it was only 148.97 ± 9.37 mg L−1 d−1 (2.83 g).

Changes in fatty acid profile and suitability to conversion into implication biodiesel

The accumulation of lipids in C. rubescens occurred along with decline in their FA unsaturation which is typical of carotenogenic microalgale under stress (Lemoine and Schoefs 2010, Solovchenko 2013). The main driver of this processes was a dramatic (2.3- to 2.7-fold) decline in trienoic FA (α-linolenic acid, ALA, C18:3Δ9,12,15 and hexadecatrienoic acid, C16:3Δ4,7,10) on the background of nearly 3-time increase in monounsaturated FA (mainly oleic acid, OA, C18:1Δ9) (Table 2). Net result of this was a 1.3-fold decline of the lipid FA Unsaturation Index (UI) and a dramatic (11- to 15-fold) buildup of the OA/ALA ratio which is perfectly in line with the FA profile changes observed in other chlorophytes including carotenogenic species (Solovchenko 2013).

Fatty acid (FA) composition of total cell lipids of Coelastrella rubescens in the beginning and in the end of the “red” stage cultivation

Acidification of the medium to the pH 5 by CO2 injection significantly affected Car DW percentage (Fig. 4) but exerted a little effect on the FA profile except a weak (5.5%) decline in monounsaturated and saturated FA. At the same time, a notable (26.5%) increase in trienoic FA (ALA and C16:3Δ4,7,10 and C18:3Δ9,12,15) was documented in this experimental variant (Table 2).

A potentially beneficial trait of the increase in the C. rubescens cell lipid FA saturation at the “red” stage is increase of its suitability for the conversion into biosiesel. To estimate the suitability of the cell lipid FA of the microalga we used the empirical equations (Islam et al. 2013, Karpagam et al. 2015) relating the FA profile of the biomass and properties of the biodiesel generated from it. Biodiesel fuel specifications as given by the international standard EN14214 in Europe (Hoekman et al. 2012). Generally, cetane number, iodine number, saponification number, degree of unsaturation, long chain saturation factor, and cold filter plugging point were calculated from the FA profile (Table 3). The biomass obtained at the “green” stage enriched in lipids harboring two essential FA (linoleic acid and ALA, totaling to 50% of total FA) can be utilized for the production e.g., of food and feed additives. By contrast, the biomass obtained at the “red” stage is highly suitable for obtaining of high quality biodiesel according to the European standard EN14214, the strictest international standard for biodiesel.

Quality parameters of the biodiesel from Coelastrella rubescens cell lipids calculated via its fatty acid profile according to Karpagam et al. (2015)

CONCLUSION

We studied stress-induced changes, including the secondary carotenogenesis, in a biotechnologically promising strain IPPAS H-350 of the chlorophyte C. rubescens Vinatzer/Innsbruck V 195 which largely escaped the attention of researchers so far. The data on the biomass accumulation and its biochemical composition obtained for the stressed cultures suggest that it is a potentially double-purpose organism. On one hand, C. rubescens can represent a source of secondary Car mixture with a considerable proportion of a value-added ketocarotenoids astaxanthin and canthaxanthin. The biomass of the microalga enriched in Car can be converted to feed additive. On the other hand, the total cell lipids of the microalga can be converted to a high-quality EN14214 standard-complying biodiesel. Unlike other carotenogenic microalgae, C. rubescens did not respond by increase in the Car productivity of the cultures to supplementation with either inorganic (CO2) or organic (NaAc) carbon on the background of the low-pH stress. C. rubescens features a complex composition of secondary Car dominated by astaxanthin together with its precursors. Still, this species holds a promise for biotechnology due to its advantages such as high growth rate exceeding that of H. pluvialis and considerably higher environmental stress tolerance.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Fig. S1.

Light (A & B) and scanning electron micrographs (C & D) of the green (A & C) and red (B) cells of Coelastrella rubescens studied in the present work (http://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2017-32-3-245-supple.pdf

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The carotenoid analysis in this work was supported by Russian Science Foundation (grant 14-50-00029). Dedicated help of Dr. Olga Chivkunova and Dr. Roman Sidorov with fatty acid analysis is gratefully appreciated.

Abbreviations

ALA

α-linolenic acid

Ast

astaxanthin

Car

carotenoids

Chl

chlorophyll(s)

FA

fatty acids

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

ITS

internal transcribed spacer

OA

oleic acid

PAR

photosynthetically active radiation

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

ROS

reactive oxygen species

References

Abe K, Hattori H, Hirano M. 2007;Accumulation and antioxidant activity of secondary carotenoids in the aerial microalga Coelastrella striolata varmultistriata. Food Chem 100:656–661.
Ahlgren G, Merino L. 1991;Lipid analysis of freshwater microalgae: a method study. Arch Hydrobiol 121:295–306.
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990;Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.
Andreyeva V. 1998. Terrestrial and aerophilic green algae (Chlorophyta: Terasporales, Chlorococcales, Chlorosarcinales) Nauka. St. Petersburg: p. 349.
Beers RF Jr, Sizer IW. 1956;Progressive inhibition of the catalase-hydrogen peroxide system by acetate, chloride and azide. Arch Biochem Biophys 60:115–125.
Bishoff H, Bold HC. 1963. Phycological studies. IV. Some soil algae from enchanted rock and related algae species University of Texas Publication. Austin, TX: p. 95.
Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. 1959;A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917.
Borowitzka M. 2013. Dunaliella: biology, production, and markets. In : Richmond A, Hu Q, eds. Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology and Biotechnology 2nd edth ed. Wiley-Blackwell. West Sussex: p. 359–368.
Borowitzka MA, Moheimani NR. 2013;Sustainable biofuels from algae. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18:13–25.
Bouarab L, Dauta A, Loudiki M. 2004;Heterotrophic and mixotrophic growth of Micractinium pusillum Fresenius in the presence of acetate and glucose: effect of light and acetate gradient concentration. Water Res 38:2706–2712.
Boussiba S. 2000;Carotenogenesis in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis: cellular physiology and stress response. Physiol Plant 108:111–117.
Brown TE, Richardson FL, Vaughn ML. 1967;Development of red pigmentation in Chlorococcum wimmeri (Chlorophyta: Chlorococcales). Phycologia 6:167–184.
Buchheim MA, Sutherland DM, Buchheim JA, Wolf M. 2013;The blood alga: phylogeny of Haematococcus (Chlorophyceae) inferred from ribosomal RNA gene sequence data. Eur J Phycol 48:318–329.
Chekanov K, Lobakova E, Selyakh I, Semenova L, Sidorov R, Solovchenko A. 2014;Accumulation of astaxanthin by a new Haematococcus pluvialis strain BM1 from the White Sea coastal rocks (Russia). Mar Drugs 12:4504–4520.
Chelebieva ES, Minyuk GS, Drobetskaya IV, Chubchikova IN. 2013;Physiological and biochemical characteristics of Ettlia carotinosa Komárek 1989 (Chlorophyceae) under experimental stress condition. Mors’kyi Ekolohichnyi Zhurnal 12:78–87.
Chubchikova IN, Minyuk GS, Drobetskaya IV. 2010;Secondary carotenogenesis in green microalgae Scotiellopsis rubescens Vinatz. under natural insolation and temperature. Ekologiya Morya 81:77–81.
Chubchikova IN, Minyuk GS, Drobetskaya IV, Dantsyuk NV. 2009;Chlorococcal microalgae as source of natural secondary carotenoids. Ekologiya Morya 77:77–83.
DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956;Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356.
Edgar RC. 2004;MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797.
Fábregas J, Otero A, Maseda A, Domínguez A. 2001;Two-stage cultures for the production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis. J Biotechnol 89:65–71.
Felsenstein J. 1985;Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
Han D, Li Y, Hu Q. 2013. Biology and commercial aspects of Haematococcus pluvialis. In : Richmond A, Hu Q, eds. Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology and Biotechnology 2nd edth ed. Wiley-Blackwell. West Sussex: p. 388–405.
Hanagata N. 1998;Phylogeny of the subfamily Scotiellocystoideae (Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta) and related taxa inferred from 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequence data. J Phycol 34:1049–1054.
Heifetz PB, Förster B, Osmond CB, Giles LJ, Boynton JE. 2000;Effects of acetate on facultative autotrophy in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii assessed by photosynthetic measurements and stable isotope analyses. Plant Physiol 122:1439–1445.
Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C, Ceniceros E, Natarajan M. 2012;Review of biodiesel composition, properties, and specifications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:143–169.
Hu C-W, Chuang L-T, Yu P-C, Chen C-NN. 2013;Pigment production by a new thermotolerant microalga Coelastrella sp. F50. Food Chem 138:2071–2078.
Hyka P, Lickova S, Přibyl P, Melzoch K, Kovar K. 2013;Flow cytometry for the development of biotechnological processes with microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 31:2–16.
Islam MA, Magnusson M, Brown RJ, Ayoko GA, Nabi MN, Heimann K. 2013;Microalgal species selection for biodiesel production based on fuel properties derived from fatty acid profiles. Energies 6:5676–5702.
Ji F, Liu Y, Li G, Zhou Y, Tian L, Ma Z, Dong R. 2013. Effects of glucose, acetic acid and glycerol on biomass accumulation of Chlorella sp. In : Proc. Am. Soc. Agr. Biol. Eng.. Kansas City, Missouri; 2013 July 21–24; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers; St. Joseph, MI: No. 131620778.
Juneja A, Ceballos RM, Murthy GS. 2013;Effects of environmental factors and nutrient availability on the biochemical composition of algae for biofuels production: a review. Energies 6:4607–4638.
Karpagam R, Raj KJ, Ashokkumar B, Varalakshmi P. 2015;Characterization and fatty acid profiling in two fresh water microalgae for biodiesel production: lipid enhancement methods and media optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 188:177–184.
Kaufnerová V, Eliáš M. 2013;The demise of the genus Scotiellopsis Vinatzer (Chlorophyta). Nova Hedwigia 97:415–428.
Kobayashi M, Kakizono T, Nagai S. 1993;Enhanced carotenoid biosynthesis by oxidative stress in acetate-induced cyst cells of a green unicellular alga, Haematococcus pluvialis. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:867–873.
Kessler E, Czygan F. 1965;Chlorella zofingiensis Donz: Isolierung neuer Stamme und ihre physiologisch-biochemischen Eigenschaften. Ber Deutsch Bot Gesell 78:342–347.
Lam MK, Lee KT. 2011;Microalgae biofuels: a critical review of issues, problems and the way forward. Biotechnol Adv 30:673–690.
Lemoine Y, Schoefs B. 2010;Secondary ketocarotenoid astaxanthin biosynthesis in algae: a multifunctional response to stress. Photosynth Res 106:155–177.
Leu S, Boussiba S. 2014;Advances in the production of high-value products by microalgae. Ind Biotechnol 10:169–183.
Lichtenthaler HK. 1987;Chlorophyll and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382.
Liu B-H, Lee Y-K. 2000;Secondary carotenoids formation by the green alga Chlorococcum sp. J Appl Phycol 12:301–307.
Liu FJ, Li SX, Huang BQ, Zheng FY, Huang XG. 2016;Effect of excessive CO2 on physiological functions in coastal diatom. Sci Rep 6:21694.
Lorenz RT, Cysewski GR. 2000;Commercial potential for Haematococcus microalgae as a natural source of astaxanthin. Trends Biotechnol 18:160–167.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951;Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275.
Minyuk G. 2008. Physiological, biochemical, and biophysical characteristics of the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis, a promising source of natural astaxanthin. In : Tokarev YN, Finenko ZZ, Shadrin NV, eds. The Black Sea Microalgae: Problems of Biodiversity Preservation and Biotechnological Usage ECOSI-Gidrofizika. Sevastopol: p. 353–392.
Minyuk GS, Chelebieva ES, Chubchikova IN, Dantsyuk NV, Drobetskaya IV, Sakhon EG, Chivkunova OB, Chekanov KA, Lobakova ES, Sidorov RA, Solovchenko AE. 2016;pH and CO2 effects on Coelastrella (Scotiellopsis) rubescens growth and metabolism. Russ J Plant Physiol 63:566–574.
Minyuk GS, Drobetskaya IV, Chubchikova IN, Dantsyuk NV, Chelebieva ES. 2010;Screening of green microalgae as potential source of nature ketocarotenoids: the relevance, strategy and study approach. Ekologiya Morya 80:67–78.
Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962;A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36.
Nelson DL, Cox MM. 2013. Lehninger principles of biochemistry 6th edth ed. MacMillan. New York: p. 1340.
Özben T. 2013. Free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: pathological and physiological significance 296Springer. New York: p. 395.
Pal D, Khozin-Goldberg I, Cohen Z, Boussiba S. 2011;The effect of light, salinity, and nitrogen availability on lipid production by Nannochloropsis sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1429–1441.
Pérez-Pérez ME, Lemaire SD, Crespo JL. 2012;Reactive oxygen species and autophagy in plants and algae. Plant Physiol 160:156–164.
Punčochářová M, Kalina T. 1981;Taxonomy of the genus Scotiellopsis Vinatzer (Chlorococcales, Chlorophyta). Algol Stud 27:119–147.
Recht L, Töpfer N, Batushansky A, Sikron N, Gibon Y, Fait A, Nikoloski Z, Boussiba S, Zarka A. 2014;Metabolite profiling and integrative modeling reveal metabolic constraints for carbon partitioning under nitrogen-starvation in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. J Biol Chem 289:30387–30403.
Saitou N, Nei M. 1987;The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425.
Sarada R, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S, Ravishankar GA. 2002;A response surface approach for the production of natural pigment astaxanthin from green alga, Haematococcus pluvialis: effect of sodium acetate, culture age, and sodium chloride. Food Biotechnol 16:107–120.
Shah MMR, Liang Y, Cheng JJ, Daroch M. 2016;Astaxanthin-producing green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis: from single cell to high value commercial products. Front Plant Sci 7:531.
Singh H, Shukla MR, Chary KVR, Rao BJ. 2014;Acetate and bicarbonate assimilation and metabolite formation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a 13C-NMR study. PLoS ONE 9:e106457.
Solovchenko AE. 2013;Physiology and adaptive significance of secondary carotenogenesis in green microalgae. Russ J Plant Physiol 60:1–13.
Solovchenko AE. 2015;Recent breakthroughs in the biology of astaxanthin accumulation by microalgal cell. Photosynth Res 125:437–449.
Solovchenko A, Chekanov K. 2014. Production of carotenoids using microalgae cultivated in ohotobioreactors. In : Paek K-Y, Murthy HN, Zhong J-J, eds. Production of Biomass and Bioactive Compounds Using Bioreactor Technology Springer. Dordrecht: p. 63–91.
Solovchenko A, Khozin-Goldberg I. 2013;High-CO2 tolerance in microalgae: possible mechanisms and implications for biotechnology and bioremediation. Biotechnol Lett 35:1745–1752.
Solovchenko A, Merzlyak MN, Khozin-Goldberg I, Cohen Z, Boussiba S. 2010;Coordinated carotenoid and lipid syntheses induced in Parietochloris incisa (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae) mutant deficient in Δ5 desaturase by nitrogen starvation and high light. J Phycol 46:763–772.
Subramanian S, Barry AN, Pieris S, Sayre RT. 2013;Comparative energetics and kinetics of autotrophic lipid and starch metabolism in chlorophytic microalgae: implications for biomass and biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:150.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013;MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729.
Vonshak A. 1985. Microalgae: laboratory growth techniques and outdoor biomass production. In : Coombs J, Hall DO, Long SP, Scurlock JMO, eds. Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis Pergamon Press. Oxford: p. 188–203.
Wang B, Zhang Z, Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, Lu Y, Han D. 2014;Cellular capacities for high-light acclimation and changing lipid profiles across life cycle stages of the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. PLoS ONE 9:e106679.
Wiessner W. 1979. Photoassimilation of organic compounds. In : Gibbs M, Latzko E, eds. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology Springer Verlag. Berlin: p. 181–189.
Wood AM, Everroad RC, Wingard LM. 2005. Measuring growth rates in microalgal cultures. In : Anderson RA, ed. Algal Culturing Techniques 18Elsevier Academic Press. Burlington, MA: p. 269–288.
Yu X, Chen L, Zhang W. 2015;Chemicals to enhance microalgal growth and accumulation of high-value bioproducts. Front Microbiol 6:56.
Zhang DH, Ng YK, Phang SM. 1997;Composition and accumulation of secondary carotenoids in Chlorococcum sp. J Appl Phycol 9:147–155.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree for selected microalgae from the order Sphaeropleales constructed by maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor joining (NJ) algorithm based on K2 model of nucleotide substitution (+G, parameter = 0.70; [+I], 60% sites). The tree with the highest log likelihood (−2,631.5234) is shown. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. ML/NJ bootstrap values >50 are shown near the branches.

Fig. 2

Changes in the cell number and biogenic element contents in the Coelastrella rubescens culture at the “green” cultivation stage (A) and size distribution of the cell population at the 11th day of cultivation (B).

Fig. 3

The changes in number (A) and average size (B) of the Coelastrella rubescens cells at the “red” stage and cell size distribution (C–E) in the culture at the eighth day with air sparging (curve 1) (C), CO2 injection (curve 2) (D), or NaAc supplementation (curve 3) (E).

Fig. 4

Pigment content expressed per cell (A–C), cell volume (D–F) or as dry biomass percentage (G–I) of Coelastrella rubescens in the beginning (1) and in the end (2–4) of the “red” stage. 2, air-sparged control; 3, CO2-supplemented culture; 4, NaAc-supplemented culture; Car., carotenoids.

Fig. 5

Carotenoid composition of Coelastrella rubescens at the end of the “green” (A) and “red” stages after 7 d of air sparging (B–D) without or with supplementation (B) of CO2 (C) or NaAc (D). Peak designation: 1, neoxanthin; 2, violaxanthin; 3, anteraxanthin; 4, lutein + zeaxanthin; 5, 6, canthaxanthin; 7, 10, 12, 13, 16, astaxanthin monoesters; 8, 14, 15, 17, adonixanthin monoesters; 11, adonixanthin monoesters + echinenone; 18, 19, 21, astaxanthin diesters; 20, α- and β-carotene. See also Table 1.

Fig. 6

Dry weight content per liter of culture (A), cell (B), or μm3 cell volume (C) and its protein (D), lipid (E), and content (F) of the “green” (1) and “red” (2–4) cells sparged with air (2), supplemented with CO2 (3) or NaAc (4). DBC, dry biomass content.

Table 1

Carotenoid composition of Coelastrella rubescens stressed cells depending on cultivation mode (% total)

Carotenoid species Green stage of cultivation Red stage of cultivation

Air CO2 NaAc
Neoxanthin 19.70 0.71 ± 0.06 1.21 ± 0.28 1.62 ± 0.25
Violaxanthin 6.45 1.24 ± 0.25 1.56 ± 0.32 1.38 ± 0.33
Anteraxanthin 4.50 2.54 ± 0.33 2.13 ± 0.25 2.62 ± 0.26
Lutein + zeaxanthin 45.30 11.48 ± 0.78 16.15 ± 1.30 37.89 ± 0.15
Canthaxanthin - 12.73 ± 0.56 19.36 ± 1.88 8.63 ± 0.39
Astaxanthin FA monoesters - 18.26 ± 1.03 19.86 ± 1.00 15.28 ± 0.64
Adonixanthin FA monoesters - 17.98 ± 0.83 12.49 ± 0.24 9.72 ± 0.11
Echinenone + adonixanthin FA monoesters - 10.84 ± 0.05 5.70 ± 1.03 3.35 ± 0.44
Astaxanthin FA diesters - 7.95 ± 0.85 5.70 ± 1.03 4.34 ± 0.16
β-Arotene + α-carotene 20.89 13.67 ± 1.29 8.54 ± 0.84 12.09 ± 0.72
Unidentified carotenoids 3.16 2.59 ± 0.60 2.21 ± 0.67 0.87 ± 0.36
Photosynthetic carotenoids - 32.24 ± 2.39 31.50 ± 0.82 58.05 ± 0.53
Ketocarotenoids - 67.76 ± 2.39 68.50 ± 0.82 41.95 ± 0.53

FA, fatty acids.

Table 2

Fatty acid (FA) composition of total cell lipids of Coelastrella rubescens in the beginning and in the end of the “red” stage cultivation

Fatty acidb Fatty acid content (mass %)a

Beginning of the “red” stage End of the “red” stage

Air CO2
C16:0 20.5 14.4 14.7
C16:1Δ7 1.0 2.1 1.1
C16:1Δ9 2.2 0.2 0.2
C16:2Δ7,10 5.5 8.8 6.2
C16:3Δ4,7,10 8.5 3.4 5.2
C18:0 0.8 3.2 1.7
C18:1Δ9 (OA) 6.8 32.7 31.0
C18:1Δ11 1.4 0.8 0.8
C18:2Δ9,12 20.8 21.5 23.0
C18:3Δ9,12,15 (ALA) 30.4 10.2 12.0
Saturated 22.0 19.9 18.9
Monoenoic 11.6 36.4 34.3
Dienoic 26.3 30.3 29.2
Trienoic 38.9 13.6 17.2
Medium chain length FA (C < 16) 0.5 0.3 0.4
Very long chain FA (C ≥ 20) 0.4 2.5 3.4
ALA/OA 4.5 0.3 0.4
Unsaturation index 1.851 1.379 1.443
a

The standard deviation was in all cases below 5% of the corresponding average.

b

Minor FA were also detected (not shown) including C16:1 ω9, C16:4 ω3, and C16:3 ω6 (≤1% each).

Table 3

Quality parameters of the biodiesel from Coelastrella rubescens cell lipids calculated via its fatty acid profile according to Karpagam et al. (2015)

Parameter End of the “green” stage End of the “red” stage European standard EN14214

Air-sparged CO2-supplemented
Saponification number (mg KOH/g oil) 197.71 ± 0.10 194.80 ± 0.27 193.82 ± 0.18 187–191
Iodine number (g I2/100 g oil) 164.30 ± 1.63 81.10 ± 1.49 78.85 ± 2.37 <120
Cetane number 36.94 ± 0.38 56.07 ± 0.37 56.72 ± 0.56 >51
Oxidation resistance, 100°C (h) 4.90 ± 0.02 13.15 ± 0.2 12.05 ± 0.21 >6
Long chain saturation factor 2.75 ± 0.13 5.05 ± 0.09 5.01 ± 0.39 Depends on climatic zone
Cold filter plugging point (°C) −7.8 ± 0.40 −0.75 ± 0.07 −1.55 ± 0.59 ≤5/≤−20
18:3 methyl esters (mass %) 30.4 10.2 12.0 ≤12